A hyperinsulinaemic, sequentially eu- and hypoglycaemic clamp test to characterize autonomous insulin secretion in patients with insulinoma

To better characterize autonomous insulin secretory behaviour in insulinoma patients and to establish diagnostic criteria with high accuracy, hyperinsulinaemic, sequentially eu‐ and hypoglycaemic clamp tests were performed in insulinoma patients and control subjects. Ten patients with insulinoma (be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical investigation Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 109 - 115
Main Authors NAUCK, M. A., BAUM, F., SEIDENSTICKER, F., RØDER, M., DINESEN, B., CREUTZFELDT, W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford BSL Blackwell Science Ltd 01.02.1997
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To better characterize autonomous insulin secretory behaviour in insulinoma patients and to establish diagnostic criteria with high accuracy, hyperinsulinaemic, sequentially eu‐ and hypoglycaemic clamp tests were performed in insulinoma patients and control subjects. Ten patients with insulinoma (benign in nine, histologically proven in nine) and 10 patients with suspected episodes of hypoglycaemia, in whom thorough clinical evaluation excluded an insulinoma, were examined. Five insulinoma patients were restudied after successful extirpation of the tumour. Suppression of C‐peptide during low‐dose [2 pmol kg–1 min–1 (20 mU kg–1h–1) for 90 min, plasma insulin approximately 120 pmol L–1 (20 mU L–1)] and high‐dose [8 pmol kg–1 h–1 (80 mU kg–1 h–1) for 90 min, plasma insulin approximately 450 pmol L–1 (75 mU L–1)] insulin infusion under euglycaemic conditions [plasma glucose 4.4–5.0 mmol L–1 (80–90 mg dL–1)]) and during high‐dose insulin infusion under hypoglycaemic conditions [glucose 2–2.2 mmol L–1 (40–45 mg dL–1)] was evaluated by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia suppressed C‐peptide in control subjects (P < 0.0001), whereas in insulinoma patients apparently irregular changes in C‐peptide concentrations (with spontaneous or paradoxical increments, P = 0.0006 vs. controls) were observed. The combination of hyperinsulinaemia and controlled hypoglycaemia led to a nearly complete suppression of C‐peptide in normal subjects (from basal, 0.76 ± 0.08–0.06 ± 0.01 nmol L–1; maximum observed value 0.10 nmol L–1), which was more pronounced than at the point of discontinuation of prolonged fasting (> 48 h; 0.26 ± 0.16 nmol L–1; P = 0.005). In insulinoma patients, C‐peptide remained elevated under all conditions (P = 0.51 vs. prolonged fasting). All these findings were reversible after successful surgical removal of the insulinoma. Insulinoma patients could be identified as abnormal by (a) non‐suppression of C‐peptide even under hyperinsulinaemic/hypoglycaemic conditions (10 out of 10 patients) and (b) irregular increments in C‐peptide under conditions that led to at least partial suppression in all normal subjects (9 out of 10 patients) and/or by an apparent shift to the left of insulin secretion relative to glucose concentrations (7 out of 10 patients). Controlled exposure to hyperinsulinaemic/hypoglycaemic conditions can help to characterize autonomous secretion in insulinoma patients and may be used as a diagnostic procedure when conventional methods yield equivocal results.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-8GH2NSNN-F
istex:6E1C5E95FB6195E2E0A0EC1663BC15104334B8D0
ArticleID:ECI63
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0014-2972
1365-2362
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2362.1997.630621.x