Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring‐derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Background We assessed the association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)‐derived glycemic markers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Methods Subjects consisted of 85 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatrics international Vol. 63; no. 2; pp. 154 - 159
Main Authors Suzuki, Junichi, Urakami, Tatsuhiko, Yoshida, Kei, Kuwabara, Remi, Mine, Yusuke, Aoki, Masako, Morioka, Ichiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background We assessed the association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)‐derived glycemic markers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Methods Subjects consisted of 85 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using FGM. We assessed the association between scanning frequencies of FGM‐ and CGM‐derived metrics: Time in range (TIR) (70‐180 mg/dL), time below range (TBR) (<70 mg/dL), time above range (>180 mg/dL), and other glycemic markers – laboratory‐measured HbA1c and CGM‐estimated glucose and HbA1c (eA1c) levels in the subjects. Results The mean number of scans was 11.5 ± 3.5 (5–20) times per day, and scanning was most frequently conducted during a period of 18–24 h. Scanning frequency showed significant positive correlation with TIR (r = 0.719, P < 0.0001) and inverse correlation with time above range (r = −0.743, P < 0.0001), but did not correlate with TBR. There were also significant inverse correlations between scanning frequency and glucose, HbA1c, and eA1c levels (r = −0.765, −0.815, and −0.793, respectively, P < 0.0001). Conclusions Frequent glucose testing with FGM decreased hyperglycemia with increased TIR, but did not reduce TBR. Coping with a rapid fall of glucose and unexpected hypoglycemia with more advanced technology might contribute to a reduction in TBR.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1328-8067
1442-200X
1442-200X
DOI:10.1111/ped.14412