High-Pressure Behavior of Mullite: An X-Ray Diffraction Investigation

Using synchrotron X‐ray diffraction and diamond anvil cells we performed in situ high‐pressure studies of mullite‐type phases of general formula Al4+2xSi2−2xO10−x and differing in the amount of oxygen vacancies: 2:1‐mullite (x = 0.4), 3:2‐mullite (x = 0.25), and sillimanite (x = 0). The structural s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Ceramic Society Vol. 96; no. 5; pp. 1635 - 1642
Main Authors Kalita, Patricia E., Schneider, Hartmut, Lipinska, Kristina, Sinogeikin, Stanislav, Hemmers, Oliver A., Cornelius, Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Columbus Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
American Ceramic Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using synchrotron X‐ray diffraction and diamond anvil cells we performed in situ high‐pressure studies of mullite‐type phases of general formula Al4+2xSi2−2xO10−x and differing in the amount of oxygen vacancies: 2:1‐mullite (x = 0.4), 3:2‐mullite (x = 0.25), and sillimanite (x = 0). The structural stability of 2:1‐mullite, 3:2‐mullite, and sillimanite was investigated up to 40.8, 27.3, and 44.6 GPa, respectively, in quasi‐hydrostatic conditions, at ambient temperature. This is the first report of a static high‐pressure investigation of Al2O3–SiO2 mullites. It was found that oxygen vacancies play a significant role in the compression mechanisms of the mullites by decreasing the mechanical stability of the phases with the number of vacancies. Elevated pressure leads to an irreversible amorphization above ~20 GPa for 2:1‐mullite and above 22 GPa for 3:2‐mullite. In sillimanite, only a partial amorphization is observed above 30 GPa. Based on Rietveld structural refinements of high‐pressure X‐ray diffraction patterns, the pressure‐driven evolution of unit cell parameters is presented. The experimental bulk moduli obtained are as follows: K0 = 162(7) GPa with K0′ = 2.2(6) for 2:1‐mullite, K0 = 173(7) GPa with K0′ = 2.3(2) for 3:2‐mullite, K0 = 167(7) GPa with K0′ = 2.1(4) for sillimanite.
Bibliography:NSF
DOE - No. DEFG36-05GO08502
US DOE
DOE-BES
DOE-NNSA (CDAC)
ark:/67375/WNG-88KCFXRQ-5
DOD-TACOM
istex:93789FB94F82D56BCF747F87E2497C0874283D75
ArticleID:JACE12191
NNSA - No. DE-FC08-01NV14049
German Research Council - No. FI442/14-1
W.M. Keck Foundation
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
DOE - BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES
ISSN:0002-7820
1551-2916
DOI:10.1111/jace.12191