A deconvolution method for the reconstruction of underlying profiles measured using large sampling volumes

A deconvolution method for diffraction measurements based on a statistical learning technique is presented. The radial‐basis function network is used to model the underlying function. A full probabilistic description of the measurement is introduced, incorporating a Bayesian algorithm based on an ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied crystallography Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 410 - 424
Main Authors Xiong, Y.-S., Withers, P. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 5 Abbey Square, Chester, Cheshire CH1 2HU, England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2006
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A deconvolution method for diffraction measurements based on a statistical learning technique is presented. The radial‐basis function network is used to model the underlying function. A full probabilistic description of the measurement is introduced, incorporating a Bayesian algorithm based on an evidence framework. This method allows predictions of both the convolution and the underlying function from noisy measurements. In addition, the method can provide an estimation of the prediction uncertainty, i.e. error‐bars. In order to assess the capability of the method, the model was tested first on synthetic data of controllable quality and sparsity; it is shown that the method works very well, even for inaccurately measured (noisy) data. Subsequently, the deconvolution method was applied to real data sets typical of neutron and synchrotron residual stress (strain) data, recovering features not immediately evident in the large‐gauge‐volume measurements themselves. Finally, the extent to which short‐period components are lost as a function of the measurement gauge dimensions is discussed. The results seem to indicate that for a triangular sensor‐sensitivity function, measurements are best made with a gauge of a width approximately equal to the wavelength of the expected strain variation, but with a significant level of overlap (∼80%) between successive points; this is contrary to current practice for neutron strain measurements.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-V51T30CC-1
ArticleID:JCRKS5071
istex:9094DC351F334BB8A1BE56D3729F213892AE6878
ISSN:1600-5767
0021-8898
1600-5767
DOI:10.1107/S0021889806012210