Skin grafts: a rural general surgical perspective
Background: Skin grafts are a common method of closing skin defects. The literature comparing methods of graft application and subsequent outcomes is poor, but reports indicate a graft failure rate between 2 and 30%. The aim of this study was to audit our current skin graft practice. Methods: Data...
Saved in:
Published in | ANZ journal of surgery Vol. 79; no. 5; pp. 362 - 366 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Melbourne, Australia
Blackwell Publishing Asia
01.05.2009
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Skin grafts are a common method of closing skin defects. The literature comparing methods of graft application and subsequent outcomes is poor, but reports indicate a graft failure rate between 2 and 30%. The aim of this study was to audit our current skin graft practice.
Methods: Data were collected prospectively on all skin grafts performed by the general surgical department between 1st December 2005 and 1st December 2006. A standardized proforma on each patient included data on age, gender, graft indication, application method, comorbidities, length of stay, and graft outcomes including graft take at 1, 2 and 6 weeks post‐operatively.
Results: There were 85 grafts performed on 74 patients, median age 72 years (9–102 years), with 10 (12%) acute admissions. Prophylactic antibiotics were given to 50% (38 of 74) of patients.
Successful grafts (>80% take) were performed in 68 (80%) patients.
The overall graft complication rate was 24.7% (22 of 85 grafts). Infection occurred in 13 of 17 graft failures. No patients underwent re‐operation for graft failure.
Patients who received prophylactic antibiotics had a reduced risk of graft failure (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.016).
Conclusion: Skin grafts were performed successfully in the majority of patients. Graft complication and failure rates compare well with the world literature. The use of prophylactic antibiotics was the only predictor of successful graft take. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | No research scholarships were received for this study, no conflict of interest identified. This study is not based on prior research. ark:/67375/WNG-3LXBGT2P-M ArticleID:ANS4890 istex:1A0901262C854E28E8D85B1A3C0760810ABD499C M. Fancourt FRCS, FRACS, MD. N. J. Henderson MBChB S. Kyle W. Gilkison FRACS, FRCS MBChB, FRACS D. Mosquera ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1445-1433 1445-2197 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04890.x |