Evaluation of no‐show rate in outpatient clinics with open access scheduling system: A systematic review

• Published in: Health science reports Vol. 7; no. 7; pp. e2160 - n/a
• Main Authors: Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza, Abadi, Fahimeh Mohammad, Tabesh, Hamed, Vakili‐arki, Hasan, Abu‐Hanna, Ameen, Ghaddaripouri, Kosar, Eslami, Saeid
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2024; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Clinics; Continuity of care; Geriatrics; Internal medicine; Intervention; Keywords; Medicine; Narrative Review; no‐show rate; Open access; open access scheduling system; Outpatient care facilities; outpatient clinics; Patient satisfaction; Pediatrics; Scheduling; Software; Systematic review; Working conditions; outpatient clinics; no‐show rate; open access scheduling system
• ISSN: 2398-8835; 2398-8835
• DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2160

Background Patients' missed appointments can cause interference in the functions of the clinics and the visit of other patients. One of the most effective strategies to solve the problem of no‐show rate is the use of an open access scheduling system (OA). This systematic review was conducted with the aim of investigating the impact of OA on the rate of no‐show of patients in outpatient clinics. Methods Relevant articles in English were investigated based on the keywords in title and using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and Google Scholar search engine (July 23, 2023). The articles using OA and reporting the no‐show rate were included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) review articles, opinion, and letters, (2) inpatient scheduling system articles, and (3) modeling or simulating OA articles. Data were extracted from the selected articles about such issues as study design, outcome measures, interventions, results, and quality score. Findings From a total of 23,403 studies, 16 articles were selected. The specialized fields included family medicine (62.5%, 10), pediatrics (25%, four), ophthalmology, podiatric, geriatrics, internal medicine, and primary care (6.25%, one). Of 16 articles, 10 papers (62.5%) showed a significant decrease in the no‐show rate. In four articles (25%), the no‐show rate was not significantly reduced. In two papers (12.5%), there were no significant changes. Conclusions According to this study results, it seems that in most outpatient clinics, the use of OA by considering some conditions such as conducting needs assessment and system design based on the patients' and providers' actual needs, and cooperating of all system stakeholders through consistent training caused a significant decrease in the no‐show rate.