On-site enzymes produced from Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and Aspergillus saccharolyticus for hydrolysis of wet exploded corn stover and loblolly pine

Cellulase production by two filamentous fungi Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and novel fungal strain, Aspergillus saccharolyticus on pretreated corn stover was investigated. Cellulase production was followed by the hydrolysis of two feedstocks, wet-exploded corn stover (WECS) and wet-exploded loblolly p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioresource technology Vol. 154; pp. 282 - 289
Main Authors Rana, Vandana, Eckard, Anahita D., Teller, Philip, Ahring, Birgitte K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cellulase production by two filamentous fungi Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and novel fungal strain, Aspergillus saccharolyticus on pretreated corn stover was investigated. Cellulase production was followed by the hydrolysis of two feedstocks, wet-exploded corn stover (WECS) and wet-exploded loblolly pine (WELP) by on-site produced enzyme cocktails containing cellulase from T. reesei RUT-C30 and β-glucosidase from A. saccharolyticus. The sugar yields using the on-site enzyme cocktails were compared with commercial enzymes preparations, Celluclast 1.5L and Novozym 188 at two substrate concentrations, 5% and 10% (w/w) and enzyme loading at 5 and 15FPU/g glucan for WECS and WELP. The highest sugar yields were obtained at 5% (w/w) substrate concentration and 15FPU/g glucan for both feedstocks. Glucose yields of 81% and 88% were obtained from on-site and commercial enzymes, respectively using WECS as feed stock. The sugar yields were 55% and 58% for WELP samples hydrolyzed with on-site and commercial enzymes, respectively. •We report on-site enzymes production from fungi using side-stream of biorefinery.•On-site enzymes showed high hydrolytic efficiency and sugar yields on WEx biomass.•Sugars yields by on-site produced enzymes and commercial enzymes were comparable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.059