Targeting Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase-δ with Theophylline Reverses Corticosteroid Insensitivity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show a poor response to corticosteroids. This has been linked to a reduction of histone deacetylase-2 as a result of oxidative stress and is reversed by theophylline. To determine the role of phosphoinositide-3-kinase-delta (PI3K-δ) on the d...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 182; no. 7; pp. 897 - 904 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
American Thoracic Society
01.10.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show a poor response to corticosteroids. This has been linked to a reduction of histone deacetylase-2 as a result of oxidative stress and is reversed by theophylline.
To determine the role of phosphoinositide-3-kinase-delta (PI3K-δ) on the development of corticosteroid insensitivity in COPD and under oxidative stress, and as a target for theophylline.
Corticosteroid sensitivity was determined as the 50% inhibitory concentration of dexamethasone on tumor necrosis factor-α-induced interleukin-8 release in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with COPD (n = 17) and compared with that of nonsmoking (n = 8) and smoking (n = 7) control subjects. The effect of theophylline and a selective PI3K-δ inhibitor (IC87114) on restoration of corticosteroid sensitivity was confirmed in cigarette smoke-exposed mice.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of COPD (50% inhibitory concentration of dexamethasone: 156.8 ± 32.6 nM) were less corticosteroid sensitive than those of nonsmoking (41.2 ± 10.5 nM; P = 0.018) and smoking control subjects (47.5 ± 19.6 nM; P = 0.031). Corticosteroid insensitivity and reduced histone deacetylase-2 activity after oxidative stress were reversed by a non-selective PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) and low concentrations of theophylline. Theophylline was a potent selective inhibitor of oxidant-activated PI3K-δ, which was up-regulated in peripheral lung tissue of patients with COPD. Furthermore, cells with knock-down of PI3K-δ failed to develop corticosteroid insensitivity with oxidative stress. Both theophylline and IC87114, combined with dexamethasone, inhibited corticosteroid-insensitive lung inflammation in cigarette-smoke-exposed mice in vivo.
Inhibition of oxidative stress dependent PI3K-δ activation by a selective inhibitor or theophylline provides a novel approach to reversing corticosteroid insensitivity in COPD. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 The article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org Author Disclosure: Y.T. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. K.I. is an employee of RespiVert through an honorary contract with Imperial College and this study has been done independent from Respivert, received $10,001–$50,000 from GlaxoSmithKline (Ph.D. studentship), $10,001–$50,000 from AstraZeneca (project grant), and $5,001–$10,000 from Cempra (project grant). Y.K. received $50,001–$100,000 from RespiVert in industry sponsored grants for contracted research. M.F. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. M.I. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. T.K. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. W.M.E. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. J.C.H. received $1,001–$5,000 from Altana as a consultant, $1,001–$5,000 from the COPD Forum as an advisory board member, $1,001–$5,000 from Boehringer Ingelheim for a lecture at Catholic University of Leuven, $1,001–$5,000 from Chiesi for a lecture at ERS 2008, more than $100,001 grant in aid of research program from GlaxoSmithKline. I.M.A. received $1,001–$5,000 from GlaxoSmithKline, $1,001–$5,000 from Novartis, and $1,001–$5,000 from Chiesi in advisory board fees, $10,001–$50,000 for serving as an expert witness from GlaxoSmithKline, more than $100,001 from GlaxoSmithKline, more than $100,001 from Pfizer, and more than $100,001 from IMMD in industry-sponsored grants. P.J.B. received $1,001–$5,000 from AstraZeneca, $1,001–$5,000 from Boehringer Ingelheim, $1,001–$5,000 from Chiesi, $1,001–$5,000 from Teva, and $1,001–$5,000 from Novartis in advisory board fees, $10,001–$50,000 from AstraZeneca, $5,001–$10,000 from Boehringer Ingelheim, $1,001–$5,000 from Teva, and $1,001–$5,000 from Chiesi in lecture fees, $5,001–$10,000 from Boehringer Ingelheim and $10,001–$50,000 from Teva for serving as an expert witness, more than $100,001 from AstraZeneca, more than $100,001 from GlaxoSmithKline, and received $50,001–$100,000 from Novartis, $50,001–$100,000 from Daiichi-Sankyo, and $50,001–$100,000 from Cempra in industry-sponsored grants. These authors contributed equally to this article. Supported by Wellcome Trust grant 076,472/Z/05/Z (K.I., I.M.A., and P.J.B.), Medical Research Council grant G0401662 (K.I., I.M.A., and P.J.B.), nonrestrictive funding by Mitsubishi Pharma and GlaxoSmithKline (K.I., I.M.A., and P.J.B), and Calistoga Pharmaceuticals grant CIHR#7246. IC87114 (W.M.E and J.C.H.). Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200906-0937OC on March 11, 2010 |
ISSN: | 1073-449X 1535-4970 1535-4970 |
DOI: | 10.1164/rccm.200906-0937OC |