Optimal vaccine allocation for the control of sexually transmitted infections
The burden of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) poses a challenge due to its large negative impact on sexual and reproductive health worldwide. Besides simple prevention measures and available treatment efforts, prophylactic vaccination is a powerful tool for controlling some viral STIs and the...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of mathematical biology Vol. 86; no. 5; p. 75 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Springer Nature B.V
01.05.2023
Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0303-6812 1432-1416 1432-1416 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00285-023-01910-y |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The burden of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) poses a challenge due to its large negative impact on sexual and reproductive health worldwide. Besides simple prevention measures and available treatment efforts, prophylactic vaccination is a powerful tool for controlling some viral STIs and their associated diseases. Here, we investigate how prophylactic vaccines are best distributed to prevent and control STIs. We consider sex-specific differences in susceptibility to infection, as well as disease severity outcomes. Different vaccination strategies are compared assuming distinct budget constraints that mimic a scarce vaccine stockpile. Vaccination strategies are obtained as solutions to an optimal control problem subject to a two-sex Kermack-McKendrick-type model, where the control variables are the daily vaccination rates for females and males. One important aspect of our approach relies on conceptualizing a limited but specific vaccine stockpile via an isoperimetric constraint. We solve the optimal control problem via Pontryagin's Maximum Principle and obtain a numerical approximation for the solution using a modified version of the forward-backward sweep method that handles the isoperimetric budget constraint in our formulation. The results suggest that for a limited vaccine supply ([Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] vaccination coverage), one-sex vaccination, prioritizing females, appears to be more beneficial than the inclusion of both sexes into the vaccination program. Whereas, if the vaccine supply is relatively large (enough to reach at least [Formula: see text] coverage), vaccinating both sexes, with a slightly higher rate for females, is optimal and provides an effective and faster approach to reducing the prevalence of the infection. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0303-6812 1432-1416 1432-1416 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00285-023-01910-y |