Unhealthy air quality secondary to wildfires is associated with lower blastocyst yield

To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A retrospective cohort study. A university-based fertility clinic. Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 121; no. 5; pp. 842 - 852
Main Authors Kornfield, Molly, Rubin, Elizabeth, Parker, Pamela, Garg, Bharti, O’Leary, Thomas, Phillips, Sara, Madding, Rachel, Baldwin, Maureen, Amato, Paula, Lee, David, Wu, Diana, Krieg, Sacha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A retrospective cohort study. A university-based fertility clinic. Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort. A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event. The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred. Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0–14] vs. 4.5 [range 0–21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group. For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield. La mala calidad del aire secundaria a los incendios forestales se asocia con una menor producción de blastocistos Estudiar el impacto de la calidad del aire no saludable provocada por los incendios forestales de Oregón de 2020 en los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a un tratamiento de fertilización in vitro (FIV). Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Clínica de fertilidad con sede en una universidad. Los sujetos estuvieron en tratamiento de FIV desde las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales con un período de exposición de 10 días. Las cohortes se clasificaron en función de si los sujetos experimentaron exposición del paciente y/o del laboratorio a una calidad del aire no saludable. La exposición de la paciente se definió como al menos 4 días de estimulación ovárica superpuesta con la exposición, y la exposición de laboratorio se definió como al menos 2 días de tratamiento de FIV y embriogénesis superpuesta con la exposición. La cohorte no expuesta estuvo formada por los sujetos restantes sin exposición definida, con ciclos en las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales. Como algunos sujetos tuvieron doble exposición y aparecieron en cohortes de exposición tanto de pacientes como de laboratorio, cada cohorte se comparó por separado con la cohorte de control no expuesta. Un período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre causada por el humo. El resultado primario fue la tasa de blastulación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la tasa de fertilización, la cantidad de blastocistos obtenidos y los ciclos sin blastocistos congelados o transferidos. Sesenta y nueve pacientes se sometieron a estimulación ovárica y tratamiento de FIV durante las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales y durante el período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre. De estas, 15 pacientes estaban en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio, 16 estaban en la cohorte de exposición de pacientes y 44 no estaban expuestas. Seis sujetos aparecieron tanto en cohortes de exposición de pacientes como de laboratorio. Aunque ninguna cohorte de exposición tuvo una tasa de blastulación significativamente menor en comparación con los no expuestos, la mediana del número de blastocistos obtenidos fue significativamente menor en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio que en el grupo no expuesto (2 [rango 0-14] vs. 4,5 [rango 0-21], respectivamente). La cohorte de exposición de laboratorio tuvo significativamente más ciclos sin obtener blastocistos (3/15 [20%] frente a 1/44 [2%]). No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados del tratamiento de FIV entre las cohortes de pacientes expuestas y no expuestas. Estos hallazgos persistieron después de controlar por edad. No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados de embarazo observados después de la transferencia de embriones entre el grupo expuesto y el grupo no expuesto. Para una cohorte de pacientes sometidas a tratamiento de FIV, un episodio agudo de exposición al humo de un incendio forestal durante la fertilización y la embriogénesis se asoció con una disminución del rendimiento de blastocistos.
AbstractList To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A retrospective cohort study. A university-based fertility clinic. Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort. A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event. The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred. Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group. For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield.
To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A retrospective cohort study. A university-based fertility clinic. Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort. A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event. The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred. Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0–14] vs. 4.5 [range 0–21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group. For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield. La mala calidad del aire secundaria a los incendios forestales se asocia con una menor producción de blastocistos Estudiar el impacto de la calidad del aire no saludable provocada por los incendios forestales de Oregón de 2020 en los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a un tratamiento de fertilización in vitro (FIV). Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Clínica de fertilidad con sede en una universidad. Los sujetos estuvieron en tratamiento de FIV desde las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales con un período de exposición de 10 días. Las cohortes se clasificaron en función de si los sujetos experimentaron exposición del paciente y/o del laboratorio a una calidad del aire no saludable. La exposición de la paciente se definió como al menos 4 días de estimulación ovárica superpuesta con la exposición, y la exposición de laboratorio se definió como al menos 2 días de tratamiento de FIV y embriogénesis superpuesta con la exposición. La cohorte no expuesta estuvo formada por los sujetos restantes sin exposición definida, con ciclos en las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales. Como algunos sujetos tuvieron doble exposición y aparecieron en cohortes de exposición tanto de pacientes como de laboratorio, cada cohorte se comparó por separado con la cohorte de control no expuesta. Un período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre causada por el humo. El resultado primario fue la tasa de blastulación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la tasa de fertilización, la cantidad de blastocistos obtenidos y los ciclos sin blastocistos congelados o transferidos. Sesenta y nueve pacientes se sometieron a estimulación ovárica y tratamiento de FIV durante las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales y durante el período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre. De estas, 15 pacientes estaban en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio, 16 estaban en la cohorte de exposición de pacientes y 44 no estaban expuestas. Seis sujetos aparecieron tanto en cohortes de exposición de pacientes como de laboratorio. Aunque ninguna cohorte de exposición tuvo una tasa de blastulación significativamente menor en comparación con los no expuestos, la mediana del número de blastocistos obtenidos fue significativamente menor en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio que en el grupo no expuesto (2 [rango 0-14] vs. 4,5 [rango 0-21], respectivamente). La cohorte de exposición de laboratorio tuvo significativamente más ciclos sin obtener blastocistos (3/15 [20%] frente a 1/44 [2%]). No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados del tratamiento de FIV entre las cohortes de pacientes expuestas y no expuestas. Estos hallazgos persistieron después de controlar por edad. No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados de embarazo observados después de la transferencia de embriones entre el grupo expuesto y el grupo no expuesto. Para una cohorte de pacientes sometidas a tratamiento de FIV, un episodio agudo de exposición al humo de un incendio forestal durante la fertilización y la embriogénesis se asoció con una disminución del rendimiento de blastocistos.
To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.OBJECTIVETo study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.A retrospective cohort study.DESIGNA retrospective cohort study.A university-based fertility clinic.SETTINGA university-based fertility clinic.Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort.PATIENTSSubjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort.A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event.INTERVENTIONA 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event.The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred.Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group.RESULTSSixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group.For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield.CONCLUSIONFor a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield.
Author Krieg, Sacha
Rubin, Elizabeth
Phillips, Sara
Madding, Rachel
Amato, Paula
Garg, Bharti
Baldwin, Maureen
Kornfield, Molly
Lee, David
Wu, Diana
Parker, Pamela
O’Leary, Thomas
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Molly
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5005-1840
  surname: Kornfield
  fullname: Kornfield, Molly
  email: siegelmo@ohsu.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Elizabeth
  surname: Rubin
  fullname: Rubin, Elizabeth
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Pamela
  surname: Parker
  fullname: Parker, Pamela
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Bharti
  surname: Garg
  fullname: Garg, Bharti
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: O’Leary
  fullname: O’Leary, Thomas
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Sara
  surname: Phillips
  fullname: Phillips, Sara
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Rachel
  surname: Madding
  fullname: Madding, Rachel
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Maureen
  surname: Baldwin
  fullname: Baldwin, Maureen
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Paula
  surname: Amato
  fullname: Amato, Paula
– sequence: 10
  givenname: David
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, David
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Diana
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Diana
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Sacha
  surname: Krieg
  fullname: Krieg, Sacha
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkMtqHDEQRYVxsMePXwhaZjMdSS31YxOSmLzAkE2craiWqhlNNJItaWL67yMzNgGvZlMFxa1T1LkgpyEGJIRy1nDGu_fbZsZUQi61NoKJtuGiYaI7ISuuVLdWnWpPyYoxrtZMDOKcXOS8ZYx1vBdn5LwdhJRMsBX5fRc2CL5sFgou0Yc9eFcWmtHEYCEttET66LydXcJMXaaQczQOCto6Lxvq4yMmOnnIJZolF7o49PaKvJnBZ7x-7pfk7uuXXzff17c_v_24-XS7NrLlpdZhBDOIVs7jyPup60zPpTJq4MyOs5kApGUMeCeA4zSNUiqJomfQys7C2F6SdwfufYoPe8xF71w26D0EjPusxShGpno5yhp9-xzdTzu0-j65XX1Qv7iogQ-HgEkx54SzNq5AcTGUBM5rzvSTfL3V_-XrJ_maC13lV8DwCvBy44jVz4dVrLL-Okw6G4fBoK3eTdE2umMgH19BjHfBGfB_cDkO8Q9Fu7zy
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2024_109147
crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deae259
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_03_001
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113178
10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.08.005
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1110
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.005
10.1093/humrep/dev330
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112060
10.1016/j.envint.2021.106666
10.1093/humupd/dmac029
10.1056/NEJMp1716846
10.1186/s12958-018-0433-z
10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182a702c5
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.028
10.1016/j.envint.2022.107181
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48684
10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00136-X
10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.026
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.009
10.1007/s10815-015-0535-x
10.1093/humrep/dez128
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.143
10.1097/01.AOG.0000435416.21944.54
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161892
10.1515/reveh-2017-0033
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004449
10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.005
10.1016/j.ccm.2020.08.006
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
– notice: Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed


MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1556-5653
EndPage 852
ExternalDocumentID 38244020
10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026
S0015028223020976
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-~X
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~5
29H
34R
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
85S
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABCQX
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACIUM
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEFWE
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AI.
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C5W
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
L7B
M41
MO0
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OK1
OQ.
P2P
PH~
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SSZ
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
W2D
X7M
XH2
XJT
XPP
YOC
YZZ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~S-
0SF
AACTN
AAIAV
ADPAM
AGZHU
ALXNB
RIG
ZA5
AAYXX
AFCTW
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c489ac8234f9917b66c7145c5810d9fcbaa4d00a162a1ebb94454e270a346da93
ISSN 0015-0282
1556-5653
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 00:51:01 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:19:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:59:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:29 EDT 2025
Sat May 04 15:44:24 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 26 16:56:58 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords IVF
embryo
Pollution
wildfire
fertility
Language English
License Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c431t-c489ac8234f9917b66c7145c5810d9fcbaa4d00a162a1ebb94454e270a346da93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-5005-1840
PMID 38244020
PQID 2929057494
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2929057494
pubmed_primary_38244020
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Fertility and sterility
PublicationTitleAlternate Fertil Steril
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References (bib26) 2021; 138
Balmes (bib24) 2018; 378
Mahalingaiah, Hart, Laden, Farland, Hewlett, Chavarro (bib1) 2016; 31
Siegel, Ghassabian, Hipwell, Factor-Litvak, Zhu, Steinthal (bib6) 2023; 29
Segal, Giudice (bib27) 2022; 118
Ramsay, Fendereski, Horns, VanDerslice, Hanson, Emery (bib14) 2023; 120
Willson, Gee, Willits, Li, Zhang, Pinkerton (bib20) 2021; 105
Xu, Zhong, Li, Li, Zhong, Liu (bib15) 2023; 870
(bib12) 2013; 122
Boulet, Zhou, Shriber, Kissin, Strosnider, Shin (bib21) 2019; 34
Dai, Shi, Bu, Yu, Sun, Hu (bib17) 2021; 214
Conforti, Mascia, Cioffi, De Angelis, Coppola, De Rosa (bib2) 2018; 16
Slama, Bottagisi, Solansky, Lepeule, Giorgis-Allemand, Sram (bib5) 2013; 24
Grippo, Zhang, Chu, Guo, Qiao, Zhang (bib13) 2018; 33
Nieuwenhuijsen, Basagaña, Dadvand, Martinez, Cirach, Beelen (bib3) 2014; 70
bib22
Balmes (bib23) 2020; 41
Morbeck (bib18) 2015; 32
Liu, Zhao, Zhang, Zhao, Kong, Zhou (bib7) 2022; 44
Checa Vizcaíno, González-Comadran, Jacquemin (bib4) 2016; 106
Zhao, Zhu, Lin, Cai (bib16) 2022; 5
Gardner, Sakkas (bib25) 2003; 24
Gaskins, Tang, Hood, Ford, Schwartz, Jones (bib8) 2021; 155
Yang, Tian, Tao, Xia, Wang, Hu (bib11) 2022; 231
Leiser, Hanson, Sawyer, Steenblik, Al-Dulaimi, Madsen (bib19) 2019; 111
Zhang, Yao, Lu, Ni, Liu, Zhou (bib9) 2022; 162
Xue, Zhang (bib10) 2018; 235
Xu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib15) 2023; 870
Boulet (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib21) 2019; 34
Gardner (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib25) 2003; 24
(10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib26) 2021; 138
Zhao (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib16) 2022; 5
Willson (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib20) 2021; 105
Grippo (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib13) 2018; 33
Mahalingaiah (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib1) 2016; 31
Zhang (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib9) 2022; 162
Siegel (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib6) 2023; 29
Liu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib7) 2022; 44
Balmes (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib23) 2020; 41
Balmes (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib24) 2018; 378
Dai (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib17) 2021; 214
(10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib12) 2013; 122
Slama (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib5) 2013; 24
Leiser (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib19) 2019; 111
Ramsay (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib14) 2023; 120
Conforti (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib2) 2018; 16
Nieuwenhuijsen (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib3) 2014; 70
Morbeck (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib18) 2015; 32
Xue (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib10) 2018; 235
Gaskins (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib8) 2021; 155
Segal (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib27) 2022; 118
Yang (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib11) 2022; 231
Checa Vizcaíno (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib4) 2016; 106
References_xml – volume: 32
  start-page: 1019
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1024
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review
  publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet
– volume: 70
  start-page: 9
  year: 2014
  end-page: 14
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Air pollution and human fertility rates
  publication-title: Environ Int
– volume: 118
  start-page: 215
  year: 2022
  end-page: 223
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Systematic review of climate change effects on reproductive health
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 41
  start-page: 771
  year: 2020
  end-page: 776
  ident: bib23
  article-title: The changing nature of wildfires: impacts on the health of the public
  publication-title: Clin Chest Med
– volume: 24
  start-page: S5
  year: 2003
  end-page: S12
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer--a review
  publication-title: Placenta
– volume: 16
  start-page: 117
  year: 2018
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Air pollution and female fertility: a systematic review of literature
  publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol
– volume: 235
  start-page: 497
  year: 2018
  end-page: 504
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Associating ambient exposure to fine particles and human fertility rates in China
  publication-title: Environ Pollut
– volume: 29
  start-page: 45
  year: 2023
  end-page: 70
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Indoor and outdoor air pollution and couple fecundability: a systematic review
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
– volume: 231
  year: 2022
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Concentrated ambient fine particles exposure affects ovarian follicle development in mice
  publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2036
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2043
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Ambient air pollution and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
– ident: bib22
  article-title: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Oregon.gov Air Quality Monitoring: Hourly Monitoring Data
– volume: 111
  start-page: 341
  year: 2019
  end-page: 347
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Acute effects of air pollutants on spontaneous pregnancy loss: a case-crossover study
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 122
  start-page: 931
  year: 2013
  end-page: 934
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Exposure to toxic environmental agents
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 162
  year: 2022
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Ambient air pollution on fecundity and live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the Yangtze River Delta of China
  publication-title: Environ Int
– volume: 44
  start-page: 49
  year: 2022
  end-page: 62
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Associations between ambient air pollution and IVF outcomes in a heavily polluted city in China
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
– volume: 5
  year: 2022
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Association of exposure to particulate matter air pollution with semen quality among men in China
  publication-title: JAMA Netw Open
– volume: 105
  start-page: 128
  year: 2021
  end-page: 135
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Effects of the 2018 Camp Fire on birth outcomes in non-human primates: case-control study
  publication-title: Reprod Toxicol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 871
  year: 2013
  end-page: 879
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Short-term impact of atmospheric pollution on fecundability
  publication-title: Epidemiology
– volume: 120
  start-page: 637
  year: 2023
  end-page: 647
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Environmental exposure to industrial air pollution is associated with decreased male fertility
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 106
  start-page: 897
  year: 2016
  end-page: 904.e1
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Outdoor air pollution and human infertility: a systematic review
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 155
  year: 2021
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Periconception air pollution, metabolomic biomarkers, and fertility among women undergoing assisted reproduction
  publication-title: Environ Int
– volume: 31
  start-page: 638
  year: 2016
  end-page: 647
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Adult air pollution exposure and risk of infertility in the Nurses’ Health Study II
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
– volume: 214
  year: 2021
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Ambient air pollutant exposure and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes in Zhengzhou, China
  publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
– volume: 378
  start-page: 881
  year: 2018
  end-page: 883
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Where there’s wildfire, there’s smoke
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 33
  start-page: 247
  year: 2018
  end-page: 264
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth
  publication-title: Rev Environ Health
– volume: 870
  year: 2023
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Sci Total Environ
– volume: 138
  start-page: e40
  year: 2021
  end-page: e54
  ident: bib26
  article-title: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice. Reducing prenatal exposure to toxic environmental agents: ACOG committee opinion, Number 832
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 231
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib11
  article-title: Concentrated ambient fine particles exposure affects ovarian follicle development in mice
  publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113178
– volume: 105
  start-page: 128
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib20
  article-title: Effects of the 2018 Camp Fire on birth outcomes in non-human primates: case-control study
  publication-title: Reprod Toxicol
  doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.08.005
– volume: 106
  start-page: 897
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib4
  article-title: Outdoor air pollution and human infertility: a systematic review
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1110
– volume: 118
  start-page: 215
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib27
  article-title: Systematic review of climate change effects on reproductive health
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.005
– volume: 31
  start-page: 638
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib1
  article-title: Adult air pollution exposure and risk of infertility in the Nurses’ Health Study II
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev330
– volume: 214
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib17
  article-title: Ambient air pollutant exposure and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes in Zhengzhou, China
  publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112060
– volume: 155
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib8
  article-title: Periconception air pollution, metabolomic biomarkers, and fertility among women undergoing assisted reproduction
  publication-title: Environ Int
  doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106666
– volume: 29
  start-page: 45
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib6
  article-title: Indoor and outdoor air pollution and couple fecundability: a systematic review
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
  doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac029
– volume: 378
  start-page: 881
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib24
  article-title: Where there’s wildfire, there’s smoke
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1716846
– volume: 16
  start-page: 117
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib2
  article-title: Air pollution and female fertility: a systematic review of literature
  publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol
  doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0433-z
– volume: 24
  start-page: 871
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib5
  article-title: Short-term impact of atmospheric pollution on fecundability
  publication-title: Epidemiology
  doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182a702c5
– volume: 111
  start-page: 341
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib19
  article-title: Acute effects of air pollutants on spontaneous pregnancy loss: a case-crossover study
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.028
– volume: 162
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib9
  article-title: Ambient air pollution on fecundity and live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the Yangtze River Delta of China
  publication-title: Environ Int
  doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107181
– volume: 5
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib16
  article-title: Association of exposure to particulate matter air pollution with semen quality among men in China
  publication-title: JAMA Netw Open
  doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48684
– volume: 24
  start-page: S5
  issue: Suppl B
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib25
  article-title: Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer--a review
  publication-title: Placenta
  doi: 10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00136-X
– volume: 44
  start-page: 49
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib7
  article-title: Associations between ambient air pollution and IVF outcomes in a heavily polluted city in China
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.026
– volume: 235
  start-page: 497
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib10
  article-title: Associating ambient exposure to fine particles and human fertility rates in China
  publication-title: Environ Pollut
  doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.009
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1019
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib18
  article-title: Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review
  publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet
  doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0535-x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2036
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib21
  article-title: Ambient air pollution and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez128
– volume: 120
  start-page: 637
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib14
  article-title: Environmental exposure to industrial air pollution is associated with decreased male fertility
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.143
– volume: 122
  start-page: 931
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib12
  article-title: Exposure to toxic environmental agents
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435416.21944.54
– volume: 870
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib15
  article-title: Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Sci Total Environ
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161892
– volume: 33
  start-page: 247
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib13
  article-title: Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth
  publication-title: Rev Environ Health
  doi: 10.1515/reveh-2017-0033
– volume: 138
  start-page: e40
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib26
  article-title: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice. Reducing prenatal exposure to toxic environmental agents: ACOG committee opinion, Number 832
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004449
– volume: 70
  start-page: 9
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib3
  article-title: Air pollution and human fertility rates
  publication-title: Environ Int
  doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.005
– volume: 41
  start-page: 771
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib23
  article-title: The changing nature of wildfires: impacts on the health of the public
  publication-title: Clin Chest Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2020.08.006
SSID ssj0006172
Score 2.468618
Snippet To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A...
To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 842
SubjectTerms embryo
fertility
IVF
Pollution
wildfire
Title Unhealthy air quality secondary to wildfires is associated with lower blastocyst yield
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0015028223020976
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244020
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2929057494
Volume 121
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBZbCmMvZfelu6DB3oJLLMs39tSOpmUk3UtS8iYkWWItqTMS5yH79TuyZNlsKXh7MYngOJHO56PvyOeC0OdMykJlYRJo2DsCqmJ45sJQByQSqQRnTOvUJDjPrpOrBf22jJd_ZJdU4lT-OphX8j9ahTHQq8mS_QfN-pvCAHwG_cIVNAzXXjpelDaNcT_itxuXH7kfbY2PW5hoOOCVQIULDWZtazqXc6eLJuR8ZVqkjQQQ6Got99tqtDfxbF2-OjFh1_Vd6wN2U9jZfPNmer0pfZPrmWlb7V_g7IStTtCNG2vzrDeWvd6rld8WLrkNNDv_YWbaPY0gtI39awxonARAEq3RUgfGGqtLwg684o4NzWy5rb9suz1muDvVMPPSTNiEwpKoPs0lB8ppX39nk8V0yuYXy_ljdETAjyADdHR5Pr0585u1IXB1SV33F12wlw0BPPxLDzGYhzyUmqnMn6Fj52LgM4uX5-iRKl-gJzMXRPES3XjYYIANdrDBHja4WmMPG3y7xS1ssIENrmGDW9jgGjav0GJyMf96Fbj2GoEE1ljBNcu5zEhENTgJqUgSmYY0lnEWjotcS8E5LcZjHiaEh0qInNKYKpKOeUSTgufRazQo16V6izDRcS5UkadFBPw70VlBEhUJotMijTmJhyhtloxJV3vetEBZsSbI8I61i83MYrOQMFjsIQq95E9bf6WHTN5ohTX5xbAjMgBSD9kvXtZxUMste0p_akDAwEybd2-8VOvdlhFwQ8A1ojkdojcWHX4-UQZ2Ety2kx7S79DT9rF7jwbVZqc-AC2uxEcH7d8Gp79v
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unhealthy+air+quality+secondary+to+wildfires+is+associated+with+lower+blastocyst+yield&rft.jtitle=Fertility+and+sterility&rft.au=Kornfield%2C+Molly&rft.au=Rubin%2C+Elizabeth&rft.au=Parker%2C+Pamela&rft.au=Garg%2C+Bharti&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.issn=1556-5653&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2023.12.026&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon