Unhealthy air quality secondary to wildfires is associated with lower blastocyst yield
To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A retrospective cohort study. A university-based fertility clinic. Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires t...
Saved in:
Published in | Fertility and sterility Vol. 121; no. 5; pp. 842 - 852 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.05.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.
A retrospective cohort study.
A university-based fertility clinic.
Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort.
A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event.
The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred.
Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0–14] vs. 4.5 [range 0–21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group.
For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield.
La mala calidad del aire secundaria a los incendios forestales se asocia con una menor producción de blastocistos
Estudiar el impacto de la calidad del aire no saludable provocada por los incendios forestales de Oregón de 2020 en los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a un tratamiento de fertilización in vitro (FIV).
Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.
Clínica de fertilidad con sede en una universidad.
Los sujetos estuvieron en tratamiento de FIV desde las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales con un período de exposición de 10 días. Las cohortes se clasificaron en función de si los sujetos experimentaron exposición del paciente y/o del laboratorio a una calidad del aire no saludable. La exposición de la paciente se definió como al menos 4 días de estimulación ovárica superpuesta con la exposición, y la exposición de laboratorio se definió como al menos 2 días de tratamiento de FIV y embriogénesis superpuesta con la exposición. La cohorte no expuesta estuvo formada por los sujetos restantes sin exposición definida, con ciclos en las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales. Como algunos sujetos tuvieron doble exposición y aparecieron en cohortes de exposición tanto de pacientes como de laboratorio, cada cohorte se comparó por separado con la cohorte de control no expuesta.
Un período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre causada por el humo.
El resultado primario fue la tasa de blastulación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la tasa de fertilización, la cantidad de blastocistos obtenidos y los ciclos sin blastocistos congelados o transferidos.
Sesenta y nueve pacientes se sometieron a estimulación ovárica y tratamiento de FIV durante las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales y durante el período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre. De estas, 15 pacientes estaban en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio, 16 estaban en la cohorte de exposición de pacientes y 44 no estaban expuestas. Seis sujetos aparecieron tanto en cohortes de exposición de pacientes como de laboratorio. Aunque ninguna cohorte de exposición tuvo una tasa de blastulación significativamente menor en comparación con los no expuestos, la mediana del número de blastocistos obtenidos fue significativamente menor en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio que en el grupo no expuesto (2 [rango 0-14] vs. 4,5 [rango 0-21], respectivamente). La cohorte de exposición de laboratorio tuvo significativamente más ciclos sin obtener blastocistos (3/15 [20%] frente a 1/44 [2%]). No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados del tratamiento de FIV entre las cohortes de pacientes expuestas y no expuestas. Estos hallazgos persistieron después de controlar por edad. No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados de embarazo observados después de la transferencia de embriones entre el grupo expuesto y el grupo no expuesto.
Para una cohorte de pacientes sometidas a tratamiento de FIV, un episodio agudo de exposición al humo de un incendio forestal durante la fertilización y la embriogénesis se asoció con una disminución del rendimiento de blastocistos. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.
A retrospective cohort study.
A university-based fertility clinic.
Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort.
A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event.
The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred.
Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group.
For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield. To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A retrospective cohort study. A university-based fertility clinic. Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort. A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event. The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred. Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0–14] vs. 4.5 [range 0–21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group. For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield. La mala calidad del aire secundaria a los incendios forestales se asocia con una menor producción de blastocistos Estudiar el impacto de la calidad del aire no saludable provocada por los incendios forestales de Oregón de 2020 en los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a un tratamiento de fertilización in vitro (FIV). Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Clínica de fertilidad con sede en una universidad. Los sujetos estuvieron en tratamiento de FIV desde las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales con un período de exposición de 10 días. Las cohortes se clasificaron en función de si los sujetos experimentaron exposición del paciente y/o del laboratorio a una calidad del aire no saludable. La exposición de la paciente se definió como al menos 4 días de estimulación ovárica superpuesta con la exposición, y la exposición de laboratorio se definió como al menos 2 días de tratamiento de FIV y embriogénesis superpuesta con la exposición. La cohorte no expuesta estuvo formada por los sujetos restantes sin exposición definida, con ciclos en las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales. Como algunos sujetos tuvieron doble exposición y aparecieron en cohortes de exposición tanto de pacientes como de laboratorio, cada cohorte se comparó por separado con la cohorte de control no expuesta. Un período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre causada por el humo. El resultado primario fue la tasa de blastulación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la tasa de fertilización, la cantidad de blastocistos obtenidos y los ciclos sin blastocistos congelados o transferidos. Sesenta y nueve pacientes se sometieron a estimulación ovárica y tratamiento de FIV durante las 6 semanas anteriores a los incendios forestales y durante el período de 10 días de calidad del aire insalubre. De estas, 15 pacientes estaban en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio, 16 estaban en la cohorte de exposición de pacientes y 44 no estaban expuestas. Seis sujetos aparecieron tanto en cohortes de exposición de pacientes como de laboratorio. Aunque ninguna cohorte de exposición tuvo una tasa de blastulación significativamente menor en comparación con los no expuestos, la mediana del número de blastocistos obtenidos fue significativamente menor en la cohorte de exposición de laboratorio que en el grupo no expuesto (2 [rango 0-14] vs. 4,5 [rango 0-21], respectivamente). La cohorte de exposición de laboratorio tuvo significativamente más ciclos sin obtener blastocistos (3/15 [20%] frente a 1/44 [2%]). No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados del tratamiento de FIV entre las cohortes de pacientes expuestas y no expuestas. Estos hallazgos persistieron después de controlar por edad. No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados de embarazo observados después de la transferencia de embriones entre el grupo expuesto y el grupo no expuesto. Para una cohorte de pacientes sometidas a tratamiento de FIV, un episodio agudo de exposición al humo de un incendio forestal durante la fertilización y la embriogénesis se asoció con una disminución del rendimiento de blastocistos. To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.OBJECTIVETo study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.A retrospective cohort study.DESIGNA retrospective cohort study.A university-based fertility clinic.SETTINGA university-based fertility clinic.Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort.PATIENTSSubjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort.A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event.INTERVENTIONA 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event.The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred.Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group.RESULTSSixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group.For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield.CONCLUSIONFor a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield. |
Author | Krieg, Sacha Rubin, Elizabeth Phillips, Sara Madding, Rachel Amato, Paula Garg, Bharti Baldwin, Maureen Kornfield, Molly Lee, David Wu, Diana Parker, Pamela O’Leary, Thomas |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Molly orcidid: 0000-0001-5005-1840 surname: Kornfield fullname: Kornfield, Molly email: siegelmo@ohsu.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Elizabeth surname: Rubin fullname: Rubin, Elizabeth – sequence: 3 givenname: Pamela surname: Parker fullname: Parker, Pamela – sequence: 4 givenname: Bharti surname: Garg fullname: Garg, Bharti – sequence: 5 givenname: Thomas surname: O’Leary fullname: O’Leary, Thomas – sequence: 6 givenname: Sara surname: Phillips fullname: Phillips, Sara – sequence: 7 givenname: Rachel surname: Madding fullname: Madding, Rachel – sequence: 8 givenname: Maureen surname: Baldwin fullname: Baldwin, Maureen – sequence: 9 givenname: Paula surname: Amato fullname: Amato, Paula – sequence: 10 givenname: David surname: Lee fullname: Lee, David – sequence: 11 givenname: Diana surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Diana – sequence: 12 givenname: Sacha surname: Krieg fullname: Krieg, Sacha |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkMtqHDEQRYVxsMePXwhaZjMdSS31YxOSmLzAkE2craiWqhlNNJItaWL67yMzNgGvZlMFxa1T1LkgpyEGJIRy1nDGu_fbZsZUQi61NoKJtuGiYaI7ISuuVLdWnWpPyYoxrtZMDOKcXOS8ZYx1vBdn5LwdhJRMsBX5fRc2CL5sFgou0Yc9eFcWmtHEYCEttET66LydXcJMXaaQczQOCto6Lxvq4yMmOnnIJZolF7o49PaKvJnBZ7x-7pfk7uuXXzff17c_v_24-XS7NrLlpdZhBDOIVs7jyPup60zPpTJq4MyOs5kApGUMeCeA4zSNUiqJomfQys7C2F6SdwfufYoPe8xF71w26D0EjPusxShGpno5yhp9-xzdTzu0-j65XX1Qv7iogQ-HgEkx54SzNq5AcTGUBM5rzvSTfL3V_-XrJ_maC13lV8DwCvBy44jVz4dVrLL-Okw6G4fBoK3eTdE2umMgH19BjHfBGfB_cDkO8Q9Fu7zy |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2024_109147 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deae259 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2024_03_001 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113178 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.08.005 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1110 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.005 10.1093/humrep/dev330 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112060 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106666 10.1093/humupd/dmac029 10.1056/NEJMp1716846 10.1186/s12958-018-0433-z 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182a702c5 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.028 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107181 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48684 10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00136-X 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.026 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.009 10.1007/s10815-015-0535-x 10.1093/humrep/dez128 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.143 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435416.21944.54 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161892 10.1515/reveh-2017-0033 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004449 10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.005 10.1016/j.ccm.2020.08.006 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine – notice: Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1556-5653 |
EndPage | 852 |
ExternalDocumentID | 38244020 10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026 S0015028223020976 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K -~X .1- .55 .FO .GJ 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1~5 29H 34R 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 85S AAEDT AAEDW AAFWJ AALRI AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO AAYWO ABCQX ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABWVN ACGFO ACIUM ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEFWE AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AGQPQ AI. AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY C5W CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W J5H K-O KOM L7B M41 MO0 N9A NQ- O9- OK1 OQ. P2P PH~ R2- ROL RPZ SDP SEL SES SEW SSZ UNMZH UV1 VH1 W2D X7M XH2 XJT XPP YOC YZZ Z5R ZGI ZXP ~S- 0SF AACTN AAIAV ADPAM AGZHU ALXNB RIG ZA5 AAYXX AFCTW CITATION NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c489ac8234f9917b66c7145c5810d9fcbaa4d00a162a1ebb94454e270a346da93 |
ISSN | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 00:51:01 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:19:28 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:59:29 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:29 EDT 2025 Sat May 04 15:44:24 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 26 16:56:58 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | IVF embryo Pollution wildfire fertility |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c431t-c489ac8234f9917b66c7145c5810d9fcbaa4d00a162a1ebb94454e270a346da93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5005-1840 |
PMID | 38244020 |
PQID | 2929057494 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2929057494 pubmed_primary_38244020 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_026 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2024 text: 2024-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Fertility and sterility |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Fertil Steril |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | (bib26) 2021; 138 Balmes (bib24) 2018; 378 Mahalingaiah, Hart, Laden, Farland, Hewlett, Chavarro (bib1) 2016; 31 Siegel, Ghassabian, Hipwell, Factor-Litvak, Zhu, Steinthal (bib6) 2023; 29 Segal, Giudice (bib27) 2022; 118 Ramsay, Fendereski, Horns, VanDerslice, Hanson, Emery (bib14) 2023; 120 Willson, Gee, Willits, Li, Zhang, Pinkerton (bib20) 2021; 105 Xu, Zhong, Li, Li, Zhong, Liu (bib15) 2023; 870 (bib12) 2013; 122 Boulet, Zhou, Shriber, Kissin, Strosnider, Shin (bib21) 2019; 34 Dai, Shi, Bu, Yu, Sun, Hu (bib17) 2021; 214 Conforti, Mascia, Cioffi, De Angelis, Coppola, De Rosa (bib2) 2018; 16 Slama, Bottagisi, Solansky, Lepeule, Giorgis-Allemand, Sram (bib5) 2013; 24 Grippo, Zhang, Chu, Guo, Qiao, Zhang (bib13) 2018; 33 Nieuwenhuijsen, Basagaña, Dadvand, Martinez, Cirach, Beelen (bib3) 2014; 70 bib22 Balmes (bib23) 2020; 41 Morbeck (bib18) 2015; 32 Liu, Zhao, Zhang, Zhao, Kong, Zhou (bib7) 2022; 44 Checa Vizcaíno, González-Comadran, Jacquemin (bib4) 2016; 106 Zhao, Zhu, Lin, Cai (bib16) 2022; 5 Gardner, Sakkas (bib25) 2003; 24 Gaskins, Tang, Hood, Ford, Schwartz, Jones (bib8) 2021; 155 Yang, Tian, Tao, Xia, Wang, Hu (bib11) 2022; 231 Leiser, Hanson, Sawyer, Steenblik, Al-Dulaimi, Madsen (bib19) 2019; 111 Zhang, Yao, Lu, Ni, Liu, Zhou (bib9) 2022; 162 Xue, Zhang (bib10) 2018; 235 Xu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib15) 2023; 870 Boulet (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib21) 2019; 34 Gardner (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib25) 2003; 24 (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib26) 2021; 138 Zhao (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib16) 2022; 5 Willson (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib20) 2021; 105 Grippo (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib13) 2018; 33 Mahalingaiah (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib1) 2016; 31 Zhang (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib9) 2022; 162 Siegel (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib6) 2023; 29 Liu (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib7) 2022; 44 Balmes (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib23) 2020; 41 Balmes (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib24) 2018; 378 Dai (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib17) 2021; 214 (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib12) 2013; 122 Slama (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib5) 2013; 24 Leiser (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib19) 2019; 111 Ramsay (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib14) 2023; 120 Conforti (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib2) 2018; 16 Nieuwenhuijsen (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib3) 2014; 70 Morbeck (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib18) 2015; 32 Xue (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib10) 2018; 235 Gaskins (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib8) 2021; 155 Segal (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib27) 2022; 118 Yang (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib11) 2022; 231 Checa Vizcaíno (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib4) 2016; 106 |
References_xml | – volume: 32 start-page: 1019 year: 2015 end-page: 1024 ident: bib18 article-title: Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet – volume: 70 start-page: 9 year: 2014 end-page: 14 ident: bib3 article-title: Air pollution and human fertility rates publication-title: Environ Int – volume: 118 start-page: 215 year: 2022 end-page: 223 ident: bib27 article-title: Systematic review of climate change effects on reproductive health publication-title: Fertil Steril – volume: 41 start-page: 771 year: 2020 end-page: 776 ident: bib23 article-title: The changing nature of wildfires: impacts on the health of the public publication-title: Clin Chest Med – volume: 24 start-page: S5 year: 2003 end-page: S12 ident: bib25 article-title: Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer--a review publication-title: Placenta – volume: 16 start-page: 117 year: 2018 ident: bib2 article-title: Air pollution and female fertility: a systematic review of literature publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol – volume: 235 start-page: 497 year: 2018 end-page: 504 ident: bib10 article-title: Associating ambient exposure to fine particles and human fertility rates in China publication-title: Environ Pollut – volume: 29 start-page: 45 year: 2023 end-page: 70 ident: bib6 article-title: Indoor and outdoor air pollution and couple fecundability: a systematic review publication-title: Hum Reprod Update – volume: 231 year: 2022 ident: bib11 article-title: Concentrated ambient fine particles exposure affects ovarian follicle development in mice publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf – volume: 34 start-page: 2036 year: 2019 end-page: 2043 ident: bib21 article-title: Ambient air pollution and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes publication-title: Hum Reprod – ident: bib22 article-title: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Oregon.gov Air Quality Monitoring: Hourly Monitoring Data – volume: 111 start-page: 341 year: 2019 end-page: 347 ident: bib19 article-title: Acute effects of air pollutants on spontaneous pregnancy loss: a case-crossover study publication-title: Fertil Steril – volume: 122 start-page: 931 year: 2013 end-page: 934 ident: bib12 article-title: Exposure to toxic environmental agents publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 162 year: 2022 ident: bib9 article-title: Ambient air pollution on fecundity and live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the Yangtze River Delta of China publication-title: Environ Int – volume: 44 start-page: 49 year: 2022 end-page: 62 ident: bib7 article-title: Associations between ambient air pollution and IVF outcomes in a heavily polluted city in China publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online – volume: 5 year: 2022 ident: bib16 article-title: Association of exposure to particulate matter air pollution with semen quality among men in China publication-title: JAMA Netw Open – volume: 105 start-page: 128 year: 2021 end-page: 135 ident: bib20 article-title: Effects of the 2018 Camp Fire on birth outcomes in non-human primates: case-control study publication-title: Reprod Toxicol – volume: 24 start-page: 871 year: 2013 end-page: 879 ident: bib5 article-title: Short-term impact of atmospheric pollution on fecundability publication-title: Epidemiology – volume: 120 start-page: 637 year: 2023 end-page: 647 ident: bib14 article-title: Environmental exposure to industrial air pollution is associated with decreased male fertility publication-title: Fertil Steril – volume: 106 start-page: 897 year: 2016 end-page: 904.e1 ident: bib4 article-title: Outdoor air pollution and human infertility: a systematic review publication-title: Fertil Steril – volume: 155 year: 2021 ident: bib8 article-title: Periconception air pollution, metabolomic biomarkers, and fertility among women undergoing assisted reproduction publication-title: Environ Int – volume: 31 start-page: 638 year: 2016 end-page: 647 ident: bib1 article-title: Adult air pollution exposure and risk of infertility in the Nurses’ Health Study II publication-title: Hum Reprod – volume: 214 year: 2021 ident: bib17 article-title: Ambient air pollutant exposure and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes in Zhengzhou, China publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf – volume: 378 start-page: 881 year: 2018 end-page: 883 ident: bib24 article-title: Where there’s wildfire, there’s smoke publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 33 start-page: 247 year: 2018 end-page: 264 ident: bib13 article-title: Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth publication-title: Rev Environ Health – volume: 870 year: 2023 ident: bib15 article-title: Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Sci Total Environ – volume: 138 start-page: e40 year: 2021 end-page: e54 ident: bib26 article-title: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice. Reducing prenatal exposure to toxic environmental agents: ACOG committee opinion, Number 832 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 231 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib11 article-title: Concentrated ambient fine particles exposure affects ovarian follicle development in mice publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113178 – volume: 105 start-page: 128 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib20 article-title: Effects of the 2018 Camp Fire on birth outcomes in non-human primates: case-control study publication-title: Reprod Toxicol doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.08.005 – volume: 106 start-page: 897 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib4 article-title: Outdoor air pollution and human infertility: a systematic review publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1110 – volume: 118 start-page: 215 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib27 article-title: Systematic review of climate change effects on reproductive health publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.06.005 – volume: 31 start-page: 638 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib1 article-title: Adult air pollution exposure and risk of infertility in the Nurses’ Health Study II publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev330 – volume: 214 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib17 article-title: Ambient air pollutant exposure and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes in Zhengzhou, China publication-title: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112060 – volume: 155 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib8 article-title: Periconception air pollution, metabolomic biomarkers, and fertility among women undergoing assisted reproduction publication-title: Environ Int doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106666 – volume: 29 start-page: 45 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib6 article-title: Indoor and outdoor air pollution and couple fecundability: a systematic review publication-title: Hum Reprod Update doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac029 – volume: 378 start-page: 881 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib24 article-title: Where there’s wildfire, there’s smoke publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1716846 – volume: 16 start-page: 117 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib2 article-title: Air pollution and female fertility: a systematic review of literature publication-title: Reprod Biol Endocrinol doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0433-z – volume: 24 start-page: 871 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib5 article-title: Short-term impact of atmospheric pollution on fecundability publication-title: Epidemiology doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182a702c5 – volume: 111 start-page: 341 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib19 article-title: Acute effects of air pollutants on spontaneous pregnancy loss: a case-crossover study publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.028 – volume: 162 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib9 article-title: Ambient air pollution on fecundity and live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the Yangtze River Delta of China publication-title: Environ Int doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107181 – volume: 5 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib16 article-title: Association of exposure to particulate matter air pollution with semen quality among men in China publication-title: JAMA Netw Open doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48684 – volume: 24 start-page: S5 issue: Suppl B year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib25 article-title: Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer--a review publication-title: Placenta doi: 10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00136-X – volume: 44 start-page: 49 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib7 article-title: Associations between ambient air pollution and IVF outcomes in a heavily polluted city in China publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.026 – volume: 235 start-page: 497 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib10 article-title: Associating ambient exposure to fine particles and human fertility rates in China publication-title: Environ Pollut doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.009 – volume: 32 start-page: 1019 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib18 article-title: Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0535-x – volume: 34 start-page: 2036 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib21 article-title: Ambient air pollution and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez128 – volume: 120 start-page: 637 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib14 article-title: Environmental exposure to industrial air pollution is associated with decreased male fertility publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.143 – volume: 122 start-page: 931 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib12 article-title: Exposure to toxic environmental agents publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435416.21944.54 – volume: 870 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib15 article-title: Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161892 – volume: 33 start-page: 247 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib13 article-title: Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth publication-title: Rev Environ Health doi: 10.1515/reveh-2017-0033 – volume: 138 start-page: e40 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib26 article-title: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice. Reducing prenatal exposure to toxic environmental agents: ACOG committee opinion, Number 832 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004449 – volume: 70 start-page: 9 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib3 article-title: Air pollution and human fertility rates publication-title: Environ Int doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.005 – volume: 41 start-page: 771 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026_bib23 article-title: The changing nature of wildfires: impacts on the health of the public publication-title: Clin Chest Med doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2020.08.006 |
SSID | ssj0006172 |
Score | 2.468618 |
Snippet | To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.
A... To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 842 |
SubjectTerms | embryo fertility IVF Pollution wildfire |
Title | Unhealthy air quality secondary to wildfires is associated with lower blastocyst yield |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0015028223020976 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244020 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2929057494 |
Volume | 121 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBZbCmMvZfelu6DB3oJLLMs39tSOpmUk3UtS8iYkWWItqTMS5yH79TuyZNlsKXh7MYngOJHO56PvyOeC0OdMykJlYRJo2DsCqmJ45sJQByQSqQRnTOvUJDjPrpOrBf22jJd_ZJdU4lT-OphX8j9ahTHQq8mS_QfN-pvCAHwG_cIVNAzXXjpelDaNcT_itxuXH7kfbY2PW5hoOOCVQIULDWZtazqXc6eLJuR8ZVqkjQQQ6Got99tqtDfxbF2-OjFh1_Vd6wN2U9jZfPNmer0pfZPrmWlb7V_g7IStTtCNG2vzrDeWvd6rld8WLrkNNDv_YWbaPY0gtI39awxonARAEq3RUgfGGqtLwg684o4NzWy5rb9suz1muDvVMPPSTNiEwpKoPs0lB8ppX39nk8V0yuYXy_ljdETAjyADdHR5Pr0585u1IXB1SV33F12wlw0BPPxLDzGYhzyUmqnMn6Fj52LgM4uX5-iRKl-gJzMXRPES3XjYYIANdrDBHja4WmMPG3y7xS1ssIENrmGDW9jgGjav0GJyMf96Fbj2GoEE1ljBNcu5zEhENTgJqUgSmYY0lnEWjotcS8E5LcZjHiaEh0qInNKYKpKOeUSTgufRazQo16V6izDRcS5UkadFBPw70VlBEhUJotMijTmJhyhtloxJV3vetEBZsSbI8I61i83MYrOQMFjsIQq95E9bf6WHTN5ohTX5xbAjMgBSD9kvXtZxUMste0p_akDAwEybd2-8VOvdlhFwQ8A1ojkdojcWHX4-UQZ2Ety2kx7S79DT9rF7jwbVZqc-AC2uxEcH7d8Gp79v |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unhealthy+air+quality+secondary+to+wildfires+is+associated+with+lower+blastocyst+yield&rft.jtitle=Fertility+and+sterility&rft.au=Kornfield%2C+Molly&rft.au=Rubin%2C+Elizabeth&rft.au=Parker%2C+Pamela&rft.au=Garg%2C+Bharti&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.issn=1556-5653&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2023.12.026&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon |