Sperm chromatin structure and reproductive fitness are altered by substitution of a single amino acid in mouse protamine 1
Conventional dogma presumes that protamine-mediated DNA compaction in sperm is achieved by electrostatic interactions between DNA and the arginine-rich core of protamines. Phylogenetic analysis reveals several non-arginine residues conserved within, but not across species. The significance of these...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature structural & molecular biology Vol. 30; no. 8; pp. 1077 - 1091 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.08.2023
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Conventional dogma presumes that protamine-mediated DNA compaction in sperm is achieved by electrostatic interactions between DNA and the arginine-rich core of protamines. Phylogenetic analysis reveals several non-arginine residues conserved within, but not across species. The significance of these residues and their post-translational modifications are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the role of K49, a rodent-specific lysine residue in protamine 1 (P1) that is acetylated early in spermiogenesis and retained in sperm. In sperm, alanine substitution (P1(K49A)) decreases sperm motility and male fertility—defects that are not rescued by arginine substitution (P1(K49R)). In zygotes, P1(K49A) leads to premature male pronuclear decompaction, altered DNA replication, and embryonic arrest. In vitro, P1(K49A) decreases protamine–DNA binding and alters DNA compaction and decompaction kinetics. Hence, a single amino acid substitution outside the P1 arginine core is sufficient to profoundly alter protein function and developmental outcomes, suggesting that protamine non-arginine residues are essential for reproductive fitness.
Here, the authors show that a single substitution in mouse P1, outside of its arginine core and independently of its charge, suffices to alter sperm chromatin structure and associated developmental outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 S.S.H., L.M., and S.B.S. contributed to overall project design. L.M., S.B.S., M.R., J.G.-K., C.S., and J.C. performed experiments. Y.S. performed ICSI experiments. R.A. assisted with purification of protamines using chromatography for in vitro biochemistry. J.M.C. performed MS experiments with N.L.K.’s oversight. M.R.B. performed analysis of fluorescence anisotropy data with oversight from P.J.O. A.G.D. and A.P.B. aided in MNase-seq analysis of sperm. S.R. performed DNA curtain experiments. Y.-C.H. generated P1(K49A) mice. J.Z.L. analyzed single embryo RNA-seq data. General project insight was provided by K.R., J.N., J.Z.L., K.E.O., S.R., and S.S.H. L.M. and S.S.H. wrote the manuscript, with input from S.R. All authors provided comments on the manuscript. Author contributions |
ISSN: | 1545-9993 1545-9985 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41594-023-01033-4 |