Use of Empty Fruit Bunches from the Oil Palm for bioethanol production: A thorough comparison between dilute acid and dilute alkali pretreatment
•Oil palm Empty Fruit Bunches shown as good candidates for bioethanol production.•Two pretreatment techniques compared (acid/alkali): the first option is superior.•Optimized dilute acid treatment (≈161°C, 10min, 1.5% acid): 85% glucose yield.•Alkali treatment is seriously hampered by high lignin con...
Saved in:
Published in | Bioresource technology Vol. 159; pp. 355 - 364 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01.05.2014
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Oil palm Empty Fruit Bunches shown as good candidates for bioethanol production.•Two pretreatment techniques compared (acid/alkali): the first option is superior.•Optimized dilute acid treatment (≈161°C, 10min, 1.5% acid): 85% glucose yield.•Alkali treatment is seriously hampered by high lignin content of the feedstock.•Fate of the different components of biomass monitored during each treatment.
In the present work, two pretreatment techniques using either dilute acid (H2SO4) or dilute alkali (NaOH) have been compared for producing bioethanol from Empty Fruit Bunches (EFBs) from oil palm tree, a relevant feedstock for tropical countries. Treatments’ performances under different conditions have been assessed and statistically optimized with respect to the response upon standardized enzymatic saccharification. The dilute acid treatment performed at optimal conditions (161.5°C, 9.44min and 1.51% acid loading) gave 85.5% glucose yield, comparable to those of other commonly investigated feedstocks. Besides, the possibility of using fibers instead of finely ground biomass may be of economic interest. Oppositely, treatment with dilute alkali has shown lower performances under the conditions explored, most likely given the relatively significant lignin content, suggesting that the use of stronger alkali regime (with the associated drawbacks) is unavoidable to improve the performance of this treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.122 |