Effect of sleep curtailment on dietary behavior and physical activity: A randomized crossover trial

Our objective was to clarify the effect of sleep curtailment on energy intake (EI) and physical activity under free-living conditions. Participants were 16 healthy women aged 21–22years. A randomized crossover trial design was used to compare a short sleep condition (SS): 4h/night (2:00–6:00) and a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiology & behavior Vol. 184; pp. 60 - 67
Main Authors Tajiri, Eri, Yoshimura, Eiichi, Hatamoto, Yoichi, Tanaka, Hiroaki, Shimoda, Seiya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Our objective was to clarify the effect of sleep curtailment on energy intake (EI) and physical activity under free-living conditions. Participants were 16 healthy women aged 21–22years. A randomized crossover trial design was used to compare a short sleep condition (SS): 4h/night (2:00–6:00) and a control sleep condition (CS): 7h/night (23:00–6:00). Each condition comprised 3 consecutive nights. Sleep duration was assessed using a wristwatch-type accelerometer at home. All living activities except sleeping were free-living. Physical activity was assessed using a tri-axial accelerometer, and was categorized by intensity level (sedentary; sedentary to light; moderate to vigorous). Participants were asked to purchase and consume meals with visible nutrient information. EI was evaluated by adding values from these food labels. Mean sleep duration in the two conditions was significantly different (4.3±0.3 vs. 7.1±0.4h, p<0.01). For the shared wakefulness period in the two conditions (6:00–23:00), step counts and physical activity were not significantly different. Sedentary time (878±61 vs. 727±40min, p<0.01), and sedentary to light-intensity activity time (1122±18 vs. 932±63min, p<0.01) were significantly increased in SS (waking time, 06:00–02:00) compared with CS (waking time, 06:00–23:00). However, these significant effects were clearly attenuated after adjustment for awake time (p>0.05). Total EI was not significantly different between conditions (8.64±0.82 vs. 8.46±1.28MJ, p>0.05), nor were leptin levels (p>0.05), but insulin and cortisol levels after SS were significantly higher than after CS (p<0.05). In this study, physical activity was increased in the SS condition and attributed to differences in awake time between conditions. However, there were no differences in EI. Further studies to investigate the effect of sleep curtailment on weight gain through stress and insulin resistance are necessary. •Physical activity was significantly higher in the short sleep condition compared with the control sleep condition.•Increased physical activity was expencted because of extra time spent awake.•Leptin levels did not differ significantly.•Insulin levels of short sleep condition were significantly higher than those of control sleep condition.•Cortisol levels of short sleep condition were significantly higher than those of control sleep condition.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9384
1873-507X
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.11.008