The organization of frontostriatal brain wiring in non-affective early psychosis compared with healthy subjects using a novel diffusion imaging fiber cluster analysis
Background Alterations in brain connectivity may underlie neuropsychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia. We here assessed the degree of convergence of frontostriatal fiber projections in 56 young adult healthy controls (HCs) and 108 matched Early Psychosis-Non-Affective patients (EP-NAs) using o...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular psychiatry Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 2301 - 2311 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.06.2023
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Alterations in brain connectivity may underlie neuropsychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia. We here assessed the degree of convergence of frontostriatal fiber projections in 56 young adult healthy controls (HCs) and 108 matched Early Psychosis-Non-Affective patients (EP-NAs) using our novel fiber cluster analysis of whole brain diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography.
Methods
Using whole brain tractography and our fiber clustering methodology on harmonized diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data from the Human Connectome Project for Early Psychosis we identified 17 white matter fiber clusters that connect frontal cortex (FCtx) and caudate (Cd) per hemisphere in each group. To quantify the degree of convergence and, hence, topographical relationship of these fiber clusters, we measured the inter-cluster mean distances between the endpoints of the fiber clusters at the level of the FCtx and of the Cd, respectively.
Results
We found (1) in both groups, bilaterally, a non-linear relationship, yielding convex curves, between FCtx and Cd distances for FCtx-Cd connecting fiber clusters, driven by a cluster projecting from inferior frontal gyrus; however, in the right hemisphere, the convex curve was more flattened in EP-NAs; (2) that cluster pairs in the right (
p
= 0.03), but not left (
p
= 0.13), hemisphere were significantly more convergent in HCs vs EP-NAs; (3) in both groups, bilaterally, similar clusters projected significantly convergently to the Cd; and, (4) a significant group by fiber cluster pair interaction for 2 right hemisphere fiber clusters (numbers 5, 11;
p
= .00023;
p
= .00023) originating in selective PFC subregions.
Conclusions
In both groups, we found the FCtx-Cd wiring pattern deviated from a strictly topographic relationship and that similar clusters projected significantly more convergently to the Cd. Interestingly, we also found a significantly more convergent pattern of connectivity in HCs in the right hemisphere and that 2 clusters from PFC subregions in the right hemisphere significantly differed in their pattern of connectivity between groups. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS JJL: conceptualization and design of the study, methodology, data analysis, writing original draft, manuscript review and editing. FZ: conceptualization and design of the study, methodology, software, data analysis, manuscript review and editing. MV: conceptualization and design of the study, methodology, software, statistical analysis, manuscript review and editing. PGN: provided input on science, review of manuscript. YR: conceptualization, methodology, manuscript review and editing. SC-K: provided input on science, methodology, review of manuscript. MK: provided input on science, manuscript review. MJC: data science, QA/QC of clinical database, review of manuscript. KEL: provided input on science, data collection, review of manuscript. DH: provided input on science, data collection, review of manuscript. MKesh: provided input on science, data collection, manuscript review and editing. SB: design and execution of MRI data processing and quality control, review of manuscript. DO: provided input on science, data collection, review of manuscript. AB: provided input on science, data collection, review of manuscript. MES: provided input on science, oversaw collection of data, manuscript review and editing. LJO: conceptualization and design of the study, methodology, software, manuscript review and editing. |
ISSN: | 1359-4184 1476-5578 1476-5578 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41380-023-02031-0 |