Aerosol and trace gas vehicle emission factors measured in a tunnel using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer and other on-line instrumentation

In this study we present measurements of gas and aerosol phase composition for a mixed vehicle fleet in the Gubrist tunnel (Switzerland) in June 2008. PM 1 composition measurements were made with a High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) and a Multi Angle Absorption Photometer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAtmospheric environment (1994) Vol. 45; no. 13; pp. 2182 - 2192
Main Authors Chirico, Roberto, Prevot, Andre S.H., DeCarlo, Peter F., Heringa, Maarten F., Richter, Rene, Weingartner, Ernest, Baltensperger, Urs
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study we present measurements of gas and aerosol phase composition for a mixed vehicle fleet in the Gubrist tunnel (Switzerland) in June 2008. PM 1 composition measurements were made with a High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) and a Multi Angle Absorption Photometer (MAAP). Gas-phase measurements of CO, CO 2, NO x and total hydrocarbons (THC) were performed with standard instrumentation. Weekdays had a characteristic diurnal pattern with 2 peaks in concentrations for all traffic related species corresponding to high vehicle density (∼300 ± 30 vehicles per 5 min) in the morning rush hour between 06:00 and 09:00 and in the afternoon rush hours from approximately 15:30 to 18:30. The emission factors (EF) of OA were heavily influenced by the OA mass loading. To exclude this partitioning effect, only organic aerosol mass concentrations from 60 μg m −3 to 90 μg m −3 were considered and for these conditions the EF(OA) value for HDV was 33.7 ± 2.3 mg km −1 for a temperature inside the tunnel of 20–25 °C. This value is not directly applicable to ambient conditions because it is derived from OA mass concentrations that are roughly a factor of 10 higher than typical ambient concentrations. An even higher EF(OA) HDV value of 47.4 ± 1.6 mg km −1 was obtained when the linear fit was applied to all data points including OA concentrations up to 120 μg m −3. Similar to the increasing EF, the OA/BC ratio in the tunnel was also affected by the organic loading and it increased by a factor of ∼3 over the OA range 10–120 μg m −3. This means that also the OA emission factors at ambient concentrations of around 5–10 μg m −3 would be 2–3 times lower than the emission factor given above. For OA concentrations lower than 40 μg m −3 the OA/BC mass ratio was below 1, while at an OA concentration of 100–120 μg m −3 the OA/BC ratio was ∼1.5. The AMS mass spectra (MS) acquired in the tunnel were highly correlated with the primary organic aerosol (POA) MS from a EURO 3 diesel vehicle with a speed similar to the average tunnel speed. ► Measurements of gas and aerosol phase composition in a tunnel are presented. ► PM 1 measurements were made with a HR-ToF-AMS and a MAAP. ► Among the species analyzed, OA and BC were the main constituents of PM 1. ► The emission factors for OA and the OA/BC ratio were affected by the organic mass loading. ► At higher OA concentration more organics in the gas phase will condense producing more OA mass.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.069
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1352-2310
1873-2844
DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.069