The sensitivity of landfast sea ice to atmospheric forcing in single-column model simulations: a case study at Zhongshan Station, Antarctica
Single-column sea ice models are used to focus on the thermodynamic evolution of the ice. Generally, these models are forced by atmospheric reanalysis in the absence of atmospheric in situ observations. Here we assess the sea ice thickness simulated by a single-column model (ICEPACK) with in situ ob...
Saved in:
Published in | The cryosphere Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. 1873 - 1887 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
17.05.2022
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Single-column sea ice models are used to focus on the thermodynamic
evolution of the ice. Generally, these models are forced by atmospheric
reanalysis in the absence of atmospheric in situ observations. Here we assess the
sea ice thickness simulated by a single-column model (ICEPACK) with
in situ observations obtained off Zhongshan Station for the austral winter of 2016.
In the reanalysis, the surface air temperature is about 1 ∘C lower,
the total precipitation is about 2 mm d−1 greater, and the surface
wind speed is about 2 m s−1 higher compared to the in situ observations. We designed sensitivity experiments to evaluate the simulation
bias in sea ice thickness due to the uncertainty in the individual
atmospheric forcing variables. Our results show that the unrealistic
precipitation in the reanalysis leads to a bias of 14.5 cm in sea ice
thickness and 17.3 cm in snow depth. In addition, our data show that
increasing snow depth works to gradually inhibit the growth of sea ice
associated with thermal blanketing by the snow due to changing the vertical
heat flux. Conversely, given suitable conditions, the sea ice thickness may
grow suddenly when the snow load gives rise to flooding and leads to
snow-ice formation. However, there are still uncertainties related to the
model results because superimposed ice and snowdrift are not implemented in
the version of the ice model used and because snow-ice formation might be
overestimated at locations with landfast sea ice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1994-0424 1994-0416 1994-0424 1994-0416 |
DOI: | 10.5194/tc-16-1873-2022 |