The linguistic validation of the gut feelings questionnaire in Turkish

Background‘Gut feelings’ are frequently used by general practitioners in the clinical decision-making process, especially in situations of uncertainty. The Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been developed in the Netherlands and is now available in English, French, German, Polish, Spanish, and Cat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of general practice Vol. 29; no. 1; p. 2273846
Main Authors Elbi, Huseyin, Tan, Makbule Neslişah, Yokus, Sidika Ece, Ozcan, Fatih, Mevsim, Vildan, Stolper, Erik
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Liverpool Taylor & Francis Ltd 01.12.2023
Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1381-4788
1751-1402
1751-1402
DOI10.1080/13814788.2023.2273846

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background‘Gut feelings’ are frequently used by general practitioners in the clinical decision-making process, especially in situations of uncertainty. The Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been developed in the Netherlands and is now available in English, French, German, Polish, Spanish, and Catalan, enabling cross-border studies on the subject. However, a Turkish version of the GFQ is lacking.ObjectivesA Turkish version of the GFQ.MethodsA linguistic validation procedure was conducted, which took place in six phases: forward translation (step 1), backward translation (step 2), first consensus (step 3), cultural validation (step 4), second consensus (step 5), and final version (step 6).ResultsThe absence of literal equivalent of the term ‘gut feelings’ in Turkish was determined. The word ‘intuition’ was chosen as the Turkish literal equivalent of ‘gut feelings’. There were also some challenges in finding the exact meanings of words and expressions in Turkish literature. However, we succeeded in finding adequate and responsible solutions. A Turkish version of the GFQ is available now.ConclusionWith these validated GFQs, Turkish GPs can facilitate studies of the role of ‘gut feelings’ in clinical reasoning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1381-4788
1751-1402
1751-1402
DOI:10.1080/13814788.2023.2273846