Attitude to sperm donation among medical students in Enugu, South-eastern Nigeria

• Published in: Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Vol. 28; no. 1; p. 96
• Main Authors: Onah, H E, Agbata, T A, Obi, S N
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.01.2008
• Subjects: Adult; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Infertility, Female - therapy; Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous - psychology; Male; Nigeria; Religion; Spermatozoa; Students, Medical - psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Nigeria
• ISSN: 1364-6893
• DOI: 10.1080/01443610701811928

This study investigated the knowledge, attitude and practices of a sample of Nigerian medical students towards sperm donation. It was a self-administered semi-structured questionnaire survey of fifth and final year medical students of the College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu campus, South-eastern Nigeria. Out of 205 eligible medical students in both classes, 180 (87.8%) responded. There were 99 male and 81 female respondents. Their ages ranged from 20 to 30 years with a mean of 24.0 +/- 2.0 years. All the participants were Christians. A total of 177 (98.3%) of the respondents were aware of the practice of sperm donation for the treatment of infertility, while three students had never heard of it. A total of 15 (15.2%) of the male respondents reported their willingness to donate their sperm for infertile couples. The main motivation for wanting to donate sperm was a desire to help infertile couples. A total of 24 (30%) of the female respondents were willing to accept donor semen should the need arise. The leading factors which discouraged the male respondents from donating semen were that the practice was either against their religious belief (41.7%) or in their opinion, was morally wrong (22.6%). Some 10.7% were afraid of a possible adverse effect on future fertility, while 9.5% were afraid of being screened for sexually transmitted infections; 20 (35%) of the female respondents would not accept donor semen because of the psychological and emotional effects of having to bring up a child that is not their husband's; 13 (23%) said it was against their religious faith, while 10 (18%) believed that adopting a child was better than accepting donor semen. Eight (14%) were afraid of contracting HIV infection through donor semen, while six (11%) declined because they would not want the paternity of their child to be questioned later. With respect to the participants' views on identity disclosure, 35 (90%) of the 39 respondents willing to donate or accept sperm objected to their identities being disclosed to the recipient couples or the donor, while four (10%) did not mind. It was concluded that, despite the high level of awareness of sperm donation among medical students in Enugu, the majority of them were unfavourably disposed to it and none had ever practiced it. Public enlightenment through the mass media and correction of false notions about infertility treatment will go a long way in addressing this problem.