Integrated and ecosystemic approaches for bridging the gap between environmental management and port management

• Published in: Journal of environmental management Vol. 206; pp. 615 - 624
• Main Authors: García-Onetti, Javier, Scherer, Marinez E.G., Barragán, Juan Manuel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 15.01.2018
• Subjects: DPSIR; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem-based management; Environmental management; Integrated coastal zone management; Port management; Port management; Ecosystem-based management; Ecosystem services; DPSIR; Environmental management; Integrated coastal zone management
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.004

The rapid exploitation of coastal and marine ecosystemic capital is on course to reach a critical point. The difficulty of implementing Integrated and ecosystem based management models, taking into the account the great complexity of the marine socio-ecological systems, has resulted in a significant gap between theory and practice. The majority of authors emphasize difficulties in engaging and convincing private stakeholders and a number of economic sectors involved in these processes. This reticence is traditionally more pronounced in the port sector, despite their important role in the transformation of coastal and marine areas. This paper seeks to establish bridges between the Environmental Management systems and Tools (EMT) of economic sectors and the Integrated and Ecosystem Based Management models (IEBM). To achieve this goal, an effort has been made to rethink concepts and principles traditionally used in EMT to bring them into line with those of IEBM. A DPSIR adapted framework is proposed and applied in a conceptual model, where the necessary elements for environmental management tools and ecosystemic models coexist. The logic of ecosystem services has been included, with special attention to the variable of human behaviour. How the proposals fit into the reality of the maritime-port sector was analysed in a transversal way, seeking Socio-Ecological Port System (SEPS) perspectives. This made it possible to move from Environmental Management Systems to an Integrated and Ecosystem Based Port Environmental Management System (PEMS-IEB). From a managerial perspective, it was also suggested that an additional DPSIR framework should be applied to the “response” component, the management system itself, understood as a system with its own elements, processes and interrelations. •Inclusive and active role of economic agents in the Integrated and Ecosystem Based Management models (IEBM).•Conceptual revision of environmental management tools.•Ecosystem services for Integrated and Ecosystem Based Port Management Systems.•DAPSI(se-w)R framework for the Socio-Ecological Port Systems.•DPSIR model to analyse the response system, for “managerial” integrated assessments.