The importance of benthos in weight of evidence sediment assessments — A case study

Sediment quality in a Texas reservoir subject to point and non-point sources of contaminants was assessed using the Sediment Quality Triad weight of evidence approach. Fifteen stations were sampled plus a reference station which, unfortunately, comprised a different habitat type than the other 15 st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 394; no. 2; pp. 252 - 264
Main Authors McPherson, Cathy, Chapman, Peter M., deBruyn, Adrian M.H., Cooper, Leah
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier B.V 15.05.2008
[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier Science
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.027

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Sediment quality in a Texas reservoir subject to point and non-point sources of contaminants was assessed using the Sediment Quality Triad weight of evidence approach. Fifteen stations were sampled plus a reference station which, unfortunately, comprised a different habitat type than the other 15 stations. Accordingly, standard comparisons between reference and exposed stations were inappropriate. Interpretation of potential relationships between benthic community structure and sediment-associated contaminants was also confounded by differences in habitat-related characteristics (e.g., water depth and total organic carbon) within the reservoir. Multivariate analyses of the benthic community identified two station groupings separated primarily by habitat-related differences rather than contaminant-related toxicity. Laboratory toxicity tests and chemical analyses, including measures of bioavailability, did not differ consistently between the two community-based station groupings, indicating that toxicity resulting from chemical contamination was not the primary factor in observed community structure in the reservoir, although alterations to the benthos due to chemical contamination could not be ruled out in the absence of an appropriate reference comparison. Appropriately giving highest weight to resident benthic community structure, followed by the results of laboratory toxicity tests, then chemical analyses, provided the best possible assessment of chemical pollution in the absence of a suitable reference comparison. The alternative approach of relying on only sediment toxicity and chemistry data, without considering the full weight of evidence, would have provided misleading information.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.027
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.027