A Validation Study for Duct Tape End Matches

Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of forensic sciences Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 504 - 508
Main Authors Bradley, Maureen J., Keagy, Roger L., Lowe, Preston C., Rickenbach, Michael P., Wright, Diana M., LeBeau, Marc A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.05.2006
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fracture matches are considered to be the strongest association achievable in forensic examinations of glass, metal, wood, plastic, paint, tape, and other trace evidence. Despite being fairly routine examinations, few publications exist to support their admissibility in court. This study was designed, using duct tape as the fractured medium, to determine the validity and error rate associated with conducting end match (fracture match) examinations on this material. Five test designs, which varied either the source roll of tape or manner of separation (torn or cut) from the roll, were administered to four analysts with instructions to examine the assigned test sets for end matches. If an end match was not identified by the initial analyst, the entire test set was independently evaluated by the remaining three analysts. Results indicated that while tape grade did not hinder end match identification, the manner of separation could affect results.
Bibliography:Presented at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences 56th Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, February 19, 2004.
ark:/67375/WNG-6823JH95-1
ArticleID:JFO106
istex:9AB9A0AF1F1AAB7F02E7F7AC18D5B55068B68EF9
*
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1198
1556-4029
DOI:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00106.x