A model-based approach to associate complexity and robustness in engineering systems

• Published in: Research in engineering design Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 223 - 234
• Main Authors: Göhler, Simon Moritz, Frey, Daniel D., Howard, Thomas J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer London 01.04.2017; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: CAE) and Design; Complexity; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD; Couplings; Engineering; Engineering Design; Expected utility; Machining; Original Paper; Robust design; Coupling; Axiomatic design; Robust design; Complexity; Contradiction
• ISSN: 0934-9839; 1435-6066
• DOI: 10.1007/s00163-016-0236-1

Ever increasing functionality and complexity of products and systems challenge development companies in achieving high and consistent quality. A model-based approach is used to investigate the relationship between system complexity and system robustness. The measure for complexity is based on the degree of functional coupling and the level of contradiction in the couplings. Whilst Suh’s independence axiom states that functional independence (uncoupled designs) produces more robust designs, this study proves this not to be the case for max-/min-is-best requirements, and only to be true in the general sense for nominal-is-best requirements. In specific cases, the independence axiom has exceptions as illustrated with a machining example, showing how a coupled solution is more robust than its uncoupled counterpart. This study also shows with statistical significance, that for max- and min-is-best requirements, the robustness is most affected by the level of contradiction between coupled functional requirements ( p  = 1.4e−36). In practice, the results imply that if the main influencing factors for each function in a system are known in the concept phase, an evaluation of the contradiction level can be used to evaluate concept robustness.