Inhaled Aviptadil Is a New Hope for Recovery of Lung Damage due to COVID-19

Objective: We are still in search of new therapeutic options for COVID-19 to prevent new infections, enable fast recovery, and reduce the long-lasting symptoms or sequelae. This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term effects of inhaled aviptadil on hospitalized, adult COVID-19 patients....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical principles and practice Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 191 - 200
Main Authors Esendagli, Dorina, Sarı, Nuran, Akhan, Sıla, Arslan, Sonay, Doğan Öntaş, İrem Asena, Yılmaz, Gürdal, Aksoy, Firdevs, Kant, Aydın, Yaşar, Kadriye Kart, Ünlü, Esra Canbolat, Akıllı, Işıl Kibar, Çelen, Mustafa Kemal, Mermutluoğlu, Çiğdem, Dayan, Saim, Kara, Emre, Durhan, Gamze, Ünal, Serhat, Demirkol, Barış, Arafat, Levent, Çetinkaya, Erdoğan, Çörtük, Mustafa, Durmuş Koçak, Nagihan, Parmaksız, Elif Torun, İnkaya, Ahmet Çağkan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland S. Karger AG 2025
Karger Publishers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: We are still in search of new therapeutic options for COVID-19 to prevent new infections, enable fast recovery, and reduce the long-lasting symptoms or sequelae. This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term effects of inhaled aviptadil on hospitalized, adult COVID-19 patients. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, placebo-controlled, comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either inhaled aviptadil or placebo, in addition to the standard care. The primary endpoint is the time from hospitalization to discharge within 30 days of treatment. The secondary endpoints are clinical and radiological score improvements. Results: The study involved 80 patients enrolled from 9 clinical centers. The mean age was 55.8 ± 18.5 years, and 27 of them (33.8%) were female. The average time to discharge was 7.8 ± 4.0 days in aviptadil group and 10 ± 5.0 days in placebo (p = 0.049). Modified Borg scales were not statistically different on day 3 (p = 0.090), but significantly lower in the aviptadil group on day 7 (p = 0.033). The CT lung damage score was not different on day 1 for both groups (p = 0.962); improvement on day 28 was significantly greater in the aviptadil group (p = 0.028). The death rate was also lower in the aviptadil group (5.1%) when compared to the placebo (12.2%). There was no drop-out due to side effects. Conclusion: Study shows that inhaled aviptadil is well tolerated and can be used as a supplementary intervention to fasten the recovery of respiratory manifestations in hospitalized patients for COVID-19 pneumonia.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1011-7571
1423-0151
1423-0151
DOI:10.1159/000543773