Thermodynamic benchmark study using Biacore technology

A total of 22 individuals participated in this benchmark study to characterize the thermodynamics of small-molecule inhibitor–enzyme interactions using Biacore instruments. Participants were provided with reagents (the enzyme carbonic anhydrase II, which was immobilized onto the sensor surface, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnalytical biochemistry Vol. 364; no. 1; pp. 67 - 77
Main Authors Navratilova, Iva, Papalia, Giuseppe A., Rich, Rebecca L., Bedinger, Daniel, Brophy, Susan, Condon, Brad, Deng, Ta, Emerick, Anne W., Guan, Hann-Wen, Hayden, Tanya, Heutmekers, Thomas, Hoorelbeke, Bart, McCroskey, Mark C., Murphy, Mary M., Nakagawa, Terry, Parmeggiani, Fabio, Qin, Xiaochun, Rebe, Sabina, Tomasevic, Nenad, Tsang, Tiffany, Waddell, M. Brett, Zhang, Fred Feiyu, Leavitt, Stephanie, Myszka, David G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A total of 22 individuals participated in this benchmark study to characterize the thermodynamics of small-molecule inhibitor–enzyme interactions using Biacore instruments. Participants were provided with reagents (the enzyme carbonic anhydrase II, which was immobilized onto the sensor surface, and four sulfonamide-based inhibitors) and were instructed to collect response data from 6 to 36 °C. van’t Hoff enthalpies and entropies were calculated from the temperature dependence of the binding constants. The equilibrium dissociation and thermodynamic constants determined from the Biacore analysis matched the values determined using isothermal titration calorimetry. These results demonstrate that immobilization of the enzyme onto the sensor surface did not alter the thermodynamics of these interactions. This benchmark study also provides insights into the opportunities and challenges in carrying out thermodynamic studies using optical biosensors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0003-2697
1096-0309
DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2007.01.031