Comparison of an Interferon-γ Release Assay with Tuberculin Skin Testing in HIV-infected Individuals

Although interferon (IFN)-gamma release assays are approved for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), limited data exist regarding their performance in HIV infection. To compare tuberculin skin test (TST) results to the commercial IFN-gamma release assay QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 175; no. 7; pp. 737 - 742
Main Authors Luetkemeyer, Annie F., Charlebois, Edwin D., Flores, Laura L., Bangsberg, David R., Deeks, Steven G., Martin, Jeffrey N., Havlir, Diane V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY American Lung Association 01.04.2007
American Thoracic Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although interferon (IFN)-gamma release assays are approved for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), limited data exist regarding their performance in HIV infection. To compare tuberculin skin test (TST) results to the commercial IFN-gamma release assay QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT) for the diagnosis of LTBI in HIV-infected adults. A total of 294 HIV-infected subjects sampled from two San Francisco cohorts underwent TST, using 5 TU of purified protein derivative, and QFT, measuring IFN-gamma response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific RD-1 antigens. Of 294 participants, 205 (70%) returned for an evaluable TST. Concordance between QFT and TST was 89.3% (kappa=0.37, p=0.007). However, in subjects with positive test results by either TST or QFT, only 28% (8/29) had positive test results by both modalities. TST-positive/QFT-negative discordant results were found in 5.1% of subjects and TST-negative/QFT-positive discordance in 5.6%. Indeterminate QFT results occurred in 5.1%, all due to a failure to respond to the phytohemagglutinin-positive control. Subjects with a CD4(+) count of less than 100 cells/mm(3) had a relative risk of an indeterminate result of 4.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.55-11.61; p=0.003) compared with those with a CD4(+) count of 100 or more. Overall concordance between QFT and TST in HIV infection was high, but agreement among subjects with positive tests by either modality was low.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.
This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org
Supported by a grant (A.F.L.) from the California AIDS Research Institute, which is funded by the Universitywide AIDS Research Program, CC99-SF-001, and by the National Institutes of Health, UCSF-GIVI Center for AIDS Research, 5 P30 AI 27763. Additional funding provided by the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies T32 MH-19105-16 (A.F.L.), and the National Institutes of Health K24-AI51982 (D.V.H.) and RO-1 MH54908 (D.R.B.). Blood collection tubes, kits, and reagents were supplied by Cellestis, Inc. (Carnegie, Australia).
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Annie Luetkemeyer, M.D., HIV/AIDS Division, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0874, Building 80, 995 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110. E-mail: aluetkemeyer@php.ucsf.edu
Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200608-1088OC on January 11, 2007
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/rccm.200608-1088OC