The Voice of Surrogate Decision-Makers. Family Responses to Prognostic Information in Chronic Critical Illness

• Published in: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 196; no. 7; pp. 864 - 872
• Main Authors: Nelson, Judith E, Hanson, Laura C, Keller, Kristine L, Carson, Shannon S, Cox, Christopher E, Tulsky, James A, White, Douglas B, Chai, Emily J, Weiss, Stefanie P, Danis, Marion
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Thoracic Society 01.10.2017
• Subjects: Brochures; Chronic Disease - psychology; Clinical decision making; Clinical trials; Communication; Critical care; Critical Care - methods; Critical Care - psychology; Critical Illness - psychology; Decision Making; Family - psychology; Female; Humans; Illnesses; Intensive care; Intervention; Male; Medical prognosis; Meetings; Middle Aged; Nurse practitioners; Original; Palliative care; Palliative Care - methods; Palliative Care - psychology; Patients; Professional-Family Relations; Prognosis; Respiration, Artificial - psychology; Respiration, Artificial - statistics & numerical data; Ventilators; mechanical ventilation; critical illness; health communication; palliative care
• ISSN: 1073-449X; 1535-4970
• DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0201OC

Information from clinicians about the expected course of the patient's illness is relevant and important for decision-making by surrogates for chronically critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation. To observe how surrogates of chronically critically ill patients respond to information about prognosis from palliative care clinicians. This was a qualitative analysis of a consecutive sample of audio-recorded meetings from a larger, multisite, randomized trial of structured informational and supportive meetings led by a palliative care physician and nurse practitioner for surrogates of patients in medical intensive care units with chronic critical illness (i.e., adults mechanically ventilated for ≥7 days and expected to remain ventilated and survive for ≥72 h). A total of 66 audio-recorded meetings involving 51 intervention group surrogates for 43 patients were analyzed using grounded theory. Six main categories of surrogate responses to prognostic information were identified: (1) receptivity, (2) deflection/rejection, (3) emotion, (4) characterization of patient, (5) consideration of surrogate role, and (6) mobilization of support. Surrogates responded in multiple and even antithetical ways, within and across meetings. Prognostic disclosure by skilled clinician communicators evokes a repertoire of responses from surrogates for the chronically critically ill. Recognition of these response patterns may help all clinicians better communicate their support to patients and families facing chronic critical illness and inform interventions to support surrogate decision-makers in intensive care units. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01230099).