EXPERIMENT ON UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING FOR ICT-INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION

• Published in: International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Vol. XLII-2/W6; pp. 371 - 377
• Main Authors: Takahashi, N., Wakutsu, R., Kato, T., Wakaizumi, T., Ooishi, T., Matsuoka, R.
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Gottingen Copernicus GmbH 01.01.2017; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Accuracy; Cameras; Concrete; Concrete placing; Construction; Construction standards; Embankments; Experiments; Image resolution; Lasers; New technology; Photogrammetry; Procedures; Terrestrial environments; Tourism
• ISSN: 2194-9034; 1682-1750; 2194-9034
• DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-371-2017

In the 2016 fiscal year the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan started a program integrating construction and ICT in earthwork and concrete placing. The new program named “i-Construction” focusing on productivity improvement adopts such new technologies as UAV photogrammetry and TLS. We report a field experiment to investigate whether the procedures of UAV photogrammetry and TLS following the standards for “i-Construction” are feasible or not. In the experiment we measured an embankment of about 80 metres by 160 metres immediately after earthwork was done on the embankment. We used two sets of UAV and camera in the experiment. One is a larger UAV enRoute Zion QC730 and its onboard camera Sony α6000. The other is a smaller UAV DJI Phantom 4 and its dedicated onboard camera. Moreover, we used a terrestrial laser scanner FARO Focus3D X330 based on the phase shift principle. The experiment results indicate that the procedures of UAV photogrammetry using a QC730 with an α6000 and TLS using a Focus3D X330 following the standards for “i-Construction” would be feasible. Furthermore, the experiment results show that UAV photogrammetry using a lower price UAV Phantom 4 was unable to satisfy the accuracy requirement for “i-Construction.” The cause of the low accuracy by Phantom 4 is under investigation. We also found that the difference of image resolution on the ground would not have a great influence on the measurement accuracy in UAV photogrammetry.