Exploiting Spatial Redundancy of Image Sensor for Motion Robust rPPG

• Published in: IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 62; no. 2; pp. 415 - 425
• Main Authors: Wang, Wenjin, Stuijk, Sander, de Haan, Gerard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States IEEE 01.02.2015
• Subjects: Algorithms; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology; Color; Colorimetry - instrumentation; Colorimetry - methods; Face; Humans; Image color analysis; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Motion; Noise; Photoplethysmography - instrumentation; Photoplethysmography - methods; Reproducibility of Results; Robustness; Sensitivity and Specificity; Skin; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Tracking; Transducers; remote sensing; photoplethysmography; Biomedical monitoring; motion analysis
• ISSN: 0018-9294; 1558-2531
• DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2356291

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) techniques can measure cardiac activity by detecting pulse-induced color variations on human skin using an RGB camera. State-of-the-art rPPG methods are sensitive to subject body motions (e.g., motion-induced color distortions). This study proposes a novel framework to improve the motion robustness of rPPG. The basic idea of this paper originates from the observation that a camera can simultaneously sample multiple skin regions in parallel, and each of them can be treated as an independent sensor for pulse measurement. The spatial redundancy of an image sensor can thus be exploited to distinguish the pulse signal from motion-induced noise. To this end, the pixel-based rPPG sensors are constructed to estimate a robust pulse signal using motion-compensated pixel-to-pixel pulse extraction, spatial pruning, and temporal filtering. The evaluation of this strategy is not based on a full clinical trial, but on 36 challenging benchmark videos consisting of subjects that differ in gender, skin types, and performed motion categories. Experimental results show that the proposed method improves the SNR of the state-of-the-art rPPG technique from 3.34 to 6.76 dB, and the agreement (±1.96σ) with instantaneous reference pulse rate from 55% to 80% correct. ANOVA with post hoc comparison shows that the improvement on motion robustness is significant. The rPPG method developed in this study has a performance that is very close to that of the contact-based sensor under realistic situations, while its computational efficiency allows real-time processing on an off-the-shelf computer.