Use of In-Laboratory Sleep Studies in the Veterans Health Administration and Community Care
The activities were undertaken in support of a VA operational project and did not constitute research, in whole or in part, in compliance with VA Handbook 1058.05. [...]institutional review board approval was not required. Because home tests are appropriate for patients with a moderate–high OSA risk...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 200; no. 6; pp. 779 - 782 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Thoracic Society
15.09.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The activities were undertaken in support of a VA operational project and did not constitute research, in whole or in part, in compliance with VA Handbook 1058.05. [...]institutional review board approval was not required. Because home tests are appropriate for patients with a moderate–high OSA risk (5), we recorded confounders that have been hypothesized to track with pretest OSA risk and medical complexity: body mass index, age, sex, race, ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes, and Charlson Comorbidity Index in the year before testing (5, 7). VA providers performed 37.7% of studies as home tests, compared with 19.0% in Fee Basis and 4.1% in Choice (Figure 1). Because of lower home testing, every 100 veterans referred to Fee Basis represented $8,831 (95% confidence interval [CI], $8,587–9,076) greater costs than those treated by VA providers, and every 100 veterans referred to Choice represented $15,814 (95% CI, $15,603–16,024) greater costs than those treated by VA providers (Table 1). [...]our average cost model likely underestimates the cost difference between community care and the VA. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1073-449X 1535-4970 |
DOI: | 10.1164/rccm.201902-0313LE |