Intensive blood pressure lowering for ischemic stroke patients: does it prevent ischemia or bleeding?

In the present post hoc analysis of RESPECT, Kitagawa et al. examined the effect of intensive BP lowering on recurrent stroke subtype risk in patients with a history of ischemic stroke, accounting for 84% of the overall participants in RESPECT [6]. The major finding was that strict BP control aiming...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHypertension research Vol. 45; no. 5; pp. 769 - 771
Main Author Toyoda, Kazunori
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Nature Publishing Group 01.05.2022
Springer Nature Singapore
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the present post hoc analysis of RESPECT, Kitagawa et al. examined the effect of intensive BP lowering on recurrent stroke subtype risk in patients with a history of ischemic stroke, accounting for 84% of the overall participants in RESPECT [6]. The major finding was that strict BP control aiming at <120/80 mmHg significantly reduced the risk of ICH. Patients assigned to intensive BP lowering did not develop ICH for a mean 3.9-year follow-up, whereas 0.39% of patients assigned to standard BP lowering developed ICH annually. It is less likely that the J-curve phenomenon exists between the follow-up BP levels and the risk of ICH relative to that of ischemic stroke, since possible cerebral hypoperfusion due to systemic hypotension rarely causes bleeding events. Most patients developing ischemic stroke took antithrombotic agents like the present RESPECT cohort, and higher BP levels during antithrombotic medication were associated with incidental ICH, as previous studies on secondary stroke prevention with antithrombotic therapy indicated [3, 4, 7]. A limitation of the analysis of the risk of ICH common to RESPECT and other previous studies is that the incidence of ICH was too low for detailed investigation.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0916-9636
1348-4214
DOI:10.1038/s41440-022-00892-6