Failure of Treatment with First-Line Lopinavir Boosted with Ritonavir Can Be Explained by Novel Resistance Pathways with Protease Mutation 76V

BackgroundVirological failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy based on lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (lopinavir/r) has rarely been associated with resistance in protease. We identified a new genotypic resistance pathway in 3 patients who experienced failure of first-line lopinavir/r treatmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 200; no. 5; pp. 698 - 709
Main Authors Nijhuis, Monique, Wensing, Annemarie M. J., Bierman, Wouter F. W., de Jong, Dorien, Kagan, Ron, Fun, Axel, Jaspers, Christian A. J. J., Schurink, Karin A. M., van Agtmael, Michael A., Boucher, Charles A. B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford The University of Chicago Press 01.09.2009
University of Chicago Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundVirological failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy based on lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (lopinavir/r) has rarely been associated with resistance in protease. We identified a new genotypic resistance pathway in 3 patients who experienced failure of first-line lopinavir/r treatment MethodsViral protease and the C-term part of Gag were sequenced. The observed mutations were introduced in a reference strain to investigate impact on protease inhibitor susceptibility and replication capacity ResultsA detailed longitudinal analysis demonstrated the selection of the M46I+L76V protease mutations in all 3 patients. The L76V conferred a solitary 3.5-fold increase in one-half the maximal inhibitory concentration to lopinavir but severely hampered viral replication. Addition of M46I, which did not confer any lopinavir resistance on its own, had a dual effect. It partly compensated for the loss in replication capacity and increased the one-half maximal inhibitory concentration to above the lower clinical cutoff (11-fold). Analysis of a large clinical database (>180,000 human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] sequences) demonstrated a significant association (Spearman ρ, 0.93) between the increased presence of L76V in clinical samples (0.5% in 2000 to 3.4% in 2006) and lopinavir prescription over time ConclusionsThe HIV protease substitution L76V, in combination with M46I, confers clinically relevant levels of lopinavir resistance and represents a novel resistance pathway to first-line lopinavir/r therapy
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-QNPBGQ85-Z
istex:60657151EFAD633371348EB48BEFA50482B10554
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Case Study-2
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/605329