Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries

• Published in: Translational and clinical pharmacology Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 186 - 196
• Main Authors: Huh, Ki Young, Yu, Kyung-Sang, Lim, Hyeong-Seok, Kim, Hyungsub
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 01.12.2021; 대한임상약리학회
• Subjects: Original; 약리학; Clinical trial; Registries; Geographic Locations; Therapeutics
• ISSN: 2289-0882; 2383-5427
• DOI: 10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e24

Public disclosure of approved clinical trials in a reliable registry can provide the transparency of the study. Although the registration of clinical trials has increased remarkably, the integrity of the data is not always satisfactory. In this study, we analyzed public clinical trial databases updated by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry to provide an overview of the trends of clinical trials approved between 2017 and 2019 in Korea. Information on clinical trials approved between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 was collected from two databases. Trial information was categorized and summarized by study phase, therapeutic area, and location of the participating centers. A total of 655 to 715 clinical trials were newly approved annually by MFDS during the period from 2017 to 2019. Phase 1 clinical trials accounted for the largest proportion (31.0%), followed by phase 3 (29.5%), investigator-initiated trials (24.1%), phase 2 (14.6%), and phase 4 (0.5%). The number of clinical trials classified as an was the greatest (40.1%) regardless of the study phase. The similar result was obtained from CRIS registry where therapeutic area (15.9%) accounted for the largest number. The number of clinical trials performed in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do was approximately 70% of the total trials. In conclusion, our study provided a comprehensive overview of clinical trials in Korea from 2017 to 2019. The discrepancy between clinical trial registries could be resolved by introducing standardized database and guidelines.