Breeding structure of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva) in Brazil

Eleven populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva), the sand fly vector of Leishmania chagasi, from different areas of Brazil were analyzed for genetic variation at 16 enzyme loci. In this region, the prevalence of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by L. chagasi is spotty and reproducti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Vol. 61; no. 1; pp. 149 - 157
Main Authors Mutebi, JP, Alexander, B, Sherlock, I, Wellington, J, Souza, AA, Shaw, J, Rangel, EF, Lanzaro, GC
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lawrence, KS ASTMH 01.07.1999
Allen Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Eleven populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva), the sand fly vector of Leishmania chagasi, from different areas of Brazil were analyzed for genetic variation at 16 enzyme loci. In this region, the prevalence of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by L. chagasi is spotty and reproductive isolation among populations of Lu. longipalpis has been reported. It is thought that morphologically similar cryptic species with varying vectorial capacity may be responsible for the discontinuous distribution of VL. The aim was to study the genetic structure of populations within this region and to identify demes that may represent sibling species. Genotypic frequencies within populations were in close compliance to Hardy-Weinberg expectations, suggesting there are no sympatric species among these 11 populations. Levels of genetic distance between pairs of populations were very low (< 0.03), consistent with local populations within a single sand fly species. When genotypic frequency data for all populations were pooled, 9 of the 13 polymorphic loci deviated from Hardy-Weinberg expectations, indicating some degree of genetic substructuring. Estimates of effective migration rates (N(e)m) among all populations were low, 2.73, suggesting that gene flow is restricted among populations, which is probably the reason for the observed genetic substructuring.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0002-9637
1476-1645
DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.149