Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar

The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in retention and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments on a digital milled bar by performing chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal of prostheses in fully edentulous models. Locator (Locator®; Zest Anchors Inc., Escondido, CA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of advanced prosthodontics Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 12 - 21
Main Authors Chae, Sung-Ki, Cho, Won-Tak, Choi, Jae-Won, Bae, Eun-Bin, Bae, Ji-Hyeon, Bae, Gang-Ho, Huh, Jung-Bo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 01.02.2022
대한치과보철학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2005-7806
2005-7814
DOI10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.12

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in retention and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments on a digital milled bar by performing chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal of prostheses in fully edentulous models. Locator (Locator®; Zest Anchors Inc., Escondido, CA, USA) was selected as the control group and ADD-TOC (ADD-TOC; PNUAdd Co., Ltd., Busan, Republic of Korea) as the experimental group. A CAD-CAM milled bar was mounted on a master model and 3 threaded holes for connecting a bar attachment was formed using a tap. Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were then attached to the milled bar. Simulated mastication and repeated insertion/removal were performed over 400,000 cyclic loadings and 1,080 insertions/removals, respectively. Wear patterns on deformed attachment were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy. For the ADD-TOC attachments, chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal resulted in a mean initial retentive force of 24.43 ± 4.89 N, which were significantly lower than that of the Locator attachment, 34.33 ± 8.25 N ( < .05). Amounts of retention loss relative to baseline for the Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were 21.74 ± 7.07 and 8.98 ± 5.76 N ( < .05). CAD-CAM milled bar with the ADD-TOC attachment had a lower initial retentive force than the Locator attachment. However, the ADD-TOC attachment might be suitable for long-term use as it showed less deformation and had a higher retentive force after simulated mastication and insertion/removal repetitions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
aThese authors contributed equally to this work.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.12
ISSN:2005-7806
2005-7814
DOI:10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.12