Realism, Functionalism and the Conditional Analysis of Dispositions

The analysis of disposition concepts in terms of conditionals has recently been challenged by C.B. Martin's electro‐fink examples, by means of which Martin tries to refute the project of a conditional analysis of dispositions in general, and to defend thereby a realistic account of dispositions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Philosophical quarterly Vol. 50; no. 201; pp. 452 - 469
Main Author Malzkorn, Wolfgang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers 01.10.2000
Blackwell Publishers Ltd
Blackwell
University of St. Andrews for the Scots Philosophical Club
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The analysis of disposition concepts in terms of conditionals has recently been challenged by C.B. Martin's electro‐fink examples, by means of which Martin tries to refute the project of a conditional analysis of dispositions in general, and to defend thereby a realistic account of dispositions. In replying to Martin, D. Lewis has presented a new and complex conditional analysis not subject to Martin's counter‐examples. However, according to Lewis' analysis, dispositions are second‐order properties and thus not efficacious. I argue that dispositions are efficacious properties, and therefore deserve a different analysis, in terms of counterfactual conditionals; this is not subject to Martin's counter‐examples. I show that my analysis is not anti‐realistic. On the contrary, my conceptual analysis of dispositions does not imply any ontological reduction that would deprive dispositions of their status as real properties of things.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0031-8094
1467-9213
DOI:10.1111/1467-9213.00199