Normative Data on the Beck Depression Inventory - Second Edition (BDI-II) in College Students

Objective This study was conducted to provide normative data on the Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition (BDI‐II) in college students. Method Data were obtained from 15,233 college students drawn from 17 universities in the United States, weighted to match the gender and race/ethnicity of enro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical psychology Vol. 71; no. 9; pp. 898 - 907
Main Authors Whisman, Mark A., Richardson, Emily D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2015
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective This study was conducted to provide normative data on the Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition (BDI‐II) in college students. Method Data were obtained from 15,233 college students drawn from 17 universities in the United States, weighted to match the gender and race/ethnicity of enrollment in degree‐granting institutions. Results Descriptive statistics, point prevalence of individuals exceeding cutoff scores, and mean differences by gender and race/ethnicity were provided. Because the distribution of BDI‐II scores was not normal, percentile ranks for raw scores were provided for the total sample and separately by gender and race/ethnicity for the total sample and by race/ethnicity for men and women. Normative data were used to calculate the Reliable Change Index on the BDI‐II for college students. Conclusion Because the distribution of BDI‐II scores demonstrated significant skewness and non‐normal kurtosis, percentile ranks are important to consider in interpreting scores on the measure, in addition to descriptive statistics.
Bibliography:istex:702BF108EEF53A401E9741FFB72C135E3120F52F
ark:/67375/WNG-5RTFCB9B-B
ArticleID:JCLP22188
We thank the researchers who generously provided us with the raw data from their published studies to include in the current analysis.
This research was supported by a grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/jclp.22188