Comparative assessment of structural and biological properties of biomimetically coated hydroxyapatite on alumina (α-Al2O3) and titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy substrates

Previous reports have shown the use of hydroxyapatite (HAp) and related calcium phosphate coatings on metal and nonmetal substrates for preparing tissue‐engineering scaffolds, especially for osteogenic differentiation. These studies have revealed that the structural properties of coated substrates a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A Vol. 94A; no. 3; pp. 913 - 926
Main Authors Kapoor, Renu, Sistla, Pavana Goury, Kumar, Jerald Mahesh, Raj, T. Avinash, Srinivas, G., Chakraborty, Jui, Sinha, Mithlesh K., Basu, Debabrata, Pande, Gopal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.09.2010
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous reports have shown the use of hydroxyapatite (HAp) and related calcium phosphate coatings on metal and nonmetal substrates for preparing tissue‐engineering scaffolds, especially for osteogenic differentiation. These studies have revealed that the structural properties of coated substrates are dependent significantly on the method and conditions used for coating and also whether the substrates had been modified prior to the coating. In this article, we have done a comparative evaluation of the structural features of the HAp coatings, prepared by using simulated body fluid (SBF) at 25°C for various time periods, on a nonporous metal substrate titanium–aluminium–vanadium (Ti‐6Al‐4V) alloy and a bioinert ceramic substrate alpha‐alumina (α‐Al2O3), with and without their prior treatment with the globular protein bovine serum albumin (BSA). Our analysis of these substrates by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier‐transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry showed significant and consistent differences in the quantitative and qualitative properties of the coatings. Interestingly, the bioactivity of these substrates in terms of supporting in vitro cell adhesion and spreading, and in vivo effects of implanted substrates, showed a predictable pattern, thus indicating that some coated substrates prepared under our conditions could be more suitable for biological/biomedical applications. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2010
Bibliography:istex:EEC9235146CF043A2EEE911CA6BB64974736E868
ArticleID:JBM32767
ark:/67375/WNG-W1N31CMJ-3
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India - No. GAP0220; No. MLP0055; No. NWP0035
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1549-3296
1552-4965
1552-4965
DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.32767