Nanotopography and oral bacterial adhesion on titanium surfaces: in vitro and in vivo studies

• Published in: Brazilian oral research Vol. 38; p. e021
• Main Authors: Schwartz-Filho, Humberto Osvaldo, Martins, Tauane Ramaldes, Sano, Paulo Roberto, Araújo, Marcela Takemoto, Chan, Daniel Cheuk Hong, Saldanha, Nathália Ramaldes, Silva, Kátia de Pádua, Graziano, Talita Signoreti, Brandt, William Cunha, Torres, Caio Vinícius Roman, Cogo-Müller, Karina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Portuguese
• Published: Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO 01.01.2024; Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
• Subjects: Bacterial Adhesion; Biofilms; Dental Implants; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE; Fusobacterium nucleatum; Humans; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Original Research/Basic Implantodontology and Biomaterials; Research Design; Titanium; Titanium; Biofilms; Dental Implants
• ISSN: 1806-8324; 1807-3107; 1807-3107
• DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0021

The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of titanium surface nanotopography on the initial bacterial adhesion process by in vivo and in vitro study models. Titanium disks were produced and characterized according to their surface topography: machined (Ti-M), microtopography (Ti-Micro), and nanotopography (Ti-Nano). For the in vivo study, 18 subjects wore oral acrylic splints containing 2 disks from each group for 24 h (n = 36). After this period, the disks were removed from the splints and evaluated by microbial culture method, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and qPCR for quantification of Streptococcus oralis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, as well as total bacteria. For the in vitro study, adhesion tests were performed with the species S. oralis and A. naeslundii for 24 h. Data were compared by ANOVA, with Tukey's post-test. Regarding the in vivo study, both the total aerobic and total anaerobic bacteria counts were similar among groups (p > 0.05). In qPCR, there was no difference among groups of bacteria adhered to the disks (p > 0.05), except for A. naeslundii, which was found in lower proportions in the Ti-Nano group (p < 0.05). In the SEM analysis, the groups had a similar bacterial distribution, with a predominance of cocci and few bacilli. In the in vitro study, there was no difference in the adhesion profile for S. oralis and A. naeslundii after 24 h of biofilm formation (p > 0.05). Thus, we conclude that micro- and nanotopography do not affect bacterial adhesion, considering an initial period of biofilm formation.