Context-dependent, risk-sensitive foraging preferences in wild rufous hummingbirds

We tested the risk-sensitive foraging preferences of wild rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus , with three types of artificial flowers. All three flower types provided the same mean volume of 30μl of sucrose, but differed in terms of variability of the reward: constant, low variance and high vari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimal behaviour Vol. 58; no. 1; pp. 59 - 66
Main Authors Hurly, T.Andrew, Oseen, Michael D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kent Elsevier Ltd 01.07.1999
Elsevier
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We tested the risk-sensitive foraging preferences of wild rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus , with three types of artificial flowers. All three flower types provided the same mean volume of 30μl of sucrose, but differed in terms of variability of the reward: constant, low variance and high variance. In trinary comparisons, subjects preferred the low-variance reward over the constant reward, and the constant reward over the high-variance reward; a result not predicted by risk-sensitive foraging theory. However, when tested with traditional binary comparisons, hummingbirds showed conventional risk-averse behaviour and selected the constant reward over the low- or high-variance rewards. This reversal of preference represents a context-dependent foraging preference. The utility of selecting intermediate levels of risk and the source of the preference reversal are discussed relative to risk-sensitive foraging theory and the effects of local context on foraging choices.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0003-3472
1095-8282
DOI:10.1006/anbe.1999.1130