Kinetic model for hydrocracking of heavy oil in a CSTR involving short term catalyst deactivation

[Display omitted] ► An atmospheric residue (312°C+) was hydroprocessed. ► Experiments were performed in continuous stirred tank basket reactor. ► A five-lump kinetic model to represent the hydrocracking reactions was used. ► A time-dependant non-selective catalyst deactivation expression was conside...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFuel (Guildford) Vol. 100; pp. 193 - 199
Main Authors Martínez, Jeremías, Ancheyta, Jorge
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] ► An atmospheric residue (312°C+) was hydroprocessed. ► Experiments were performed in continuous stirred tank basket reactor. ► A five-lump kinetic model to represent the hydrocracking reactions was used. ► A time-dependant non-selective catalyst deactivation expression was considered. ► Activation energies and kinetic constants for heavy oil hydrocracking are reported. A five-lump model previously reported in the literature was used for the kinetic modeling of an atmospheric residue (312°C+) hydrocracking. The model has ten reaction rate coefficients, makes a distinction of different hydrocarbon groups based on boiling ranges, and includes the following lumps: unconverted vacuum residue (538°C+), vacuum gas oil (VGO; 343–538°C), middle distillates (204–343°C), naphtha (IBP-204°C), and gases. The kinetic study was carried out in a CSTBR at the following operating conditions: 380–420°C, 100kgf/cm2, 5000std ft3 H2/bbl of oil, and 0.5–1.25mlfeed/(mlcath). Experiments were performed with a commercial size tetra lobular catalyst. The model also incorporates the effectiveness factor, and a time-dependant deactivation function for obtaining the intrinsic kinetic parameters. The hydrocracking of vacuum residue, VGO and middle distillates exhibited a higher selectivity toward the heavier lumps as temperature is increased. The predicted product composition is in good agreement with experimental values with an average absolute error less than 5%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153
DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.05.032