Characterization of brushite as a re-crystallization product formed during bacterial solubilization of hydroxyapatite in batch cultures

Two strains of bacteria ( Burkholderia sp., strain FeGL01, and Burkholderia caribiensis, strain FeGL03) were isolated from a Brazilian high phosphorus iron ore. The capacity of both strains to solubilize hydroxyapatite, Ca 5(PO 4) 3(OH), was assessed in plate and batch cultures. In batch cultures, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSoil biology & biochemistry Vol. 38; no. 9; pp. 2645 - 2654
Main Authors Delvasto, P., Valverde, A., Ballester, A., Igual, J.M., Muñoz, J.A., González, F., Blázquez, M.L., García, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2006
New York, NY Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two strains of bacteria ( Burkholderia sp., strain FeGL01, and Burkholderia caribiensis, strain FeGL03) were isolated from a Brazilian high phosphorus iron ore. The capacity of both strains to solubilize hydroxyapatite, Ca 5(PO 4) 3(OH), was assessed in plate and batch cultures. In batch cultures, the concentration of solution-P showed two kinetics: an initial one, characterized by a continuously increasing kinetics and a second one, characterized by oscillatory kinetics. To understand the nature of these oscillations, phosphatic residues in the spent broth were collected before, during and after the oscillations, and characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray chemical microanalyses (EDX) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). From these studies, it was found that drops in P concentration were related to the formation of an intermediate phosphate in the residues, identified as brushite, CaHPO 4·2H 2O. Later increase of available P in the solution was found to be a consequence of re-dissolution of brushite crystals previously formed. Re-crystallization of brushite was also detected in plate cultures after 12–14 days of incubation
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.03.020
ISSN:0038-0717
1879-3428
DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.03.020