Does becoming an informal caregiver make your health worse? A longitudinal analysis across Europe

To determine whether becoming an informal caregiver in Europe has a significant effect on health status, compared with non-informal caregivers, distinguishing by place of residence (in or outside the home of the care receivers) and country. And to determine whether there is an adaptation effect afte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEconomics and human biology Vol. 50; p. 101264
Main Authors Longobardo, Luz María Peña, Rodríguez-Sánchez, Beatriz, Oliva, Juan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.08.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine whether becoming an informal caregiver in Europe has a significant effect on health status, compared with non-informal caregivers, distinguishing by place of residence (in or outside the home of the care receivers) and country. And to determine whether there is an adaptation effect after the passage of time. The Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (2004–2017) was used. Propensity score matching was applied to analyse the differences in the health status of people who became informal carers between different periods and those who did not. We considered short-term (2–3 years after the shock) and medium-term effects (4–5 years). In the short term, the probability of those who became informal caregivers being depressed was 3.7% points (p.p.) higher than among their counterparts, being higher among those who lived in the care recipients’ homes (12.8 p.p.) and those providing care outside and at home (12.9 p.p.). Significant differences in the probability of being depressed were also observed by country (Southern and Eastern Europe), and in countries with low expenditure on long-term care (LTC). Those effects remained in the medium term. No significant effects were found in cancer, stroke, heart attack and diabetes. The results might help to concentrate a major effort of any policy in the field of mental health on the period immediately after the negative shock, especially for those caregivers who live with the care receiver, for those in Southern and Eastern Europe and in countries with low expenditure on LTC. •Our study provides new evidence on the effect of becoming (transition situation) an informal caregiver on health status.•An immediate effect is identified on health, especially on mental health, when respondents become informal caregivers.•This effect does not remit but is maintained and even becomes stronger over time.•The findings could be helpful to identify the most vulnerable informal caregivers.•The most vulnerable would be those providing care at home and those in countries where LTC expenditure intensity is low.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1570-677X
1873-6130
DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101264