Further evaluation of an EMG technique for assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles

• Published in: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology Vol. 16; no. 6; pp. 621 - 628
• Main Authors: Falla, D., Jull, G., O’Leary, S., Dall’Alba, P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2006
• Subjects: Adult; Cervical spine; Cervical Vertebrae - anatomy & histology; Cervical Vertebrae - physiology; Electromyography; Electromyography - methods; Female; Head Movements - physiology; Humans; Isometric Contraction - physiology; Longus capitis; Longus colli; Masticatory Muscles - physiology; Middle Aged; Movement - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Neck Muscles - physiology; Posture; Reference Values; Research Design; Rotation; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Longus colli; Electromyography; Longus capitis; Cervical spine
• ISSN: 1050-6411; 1873-5711
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.10.003

A novel surface electromyographic (EMG) technique was recently described for the detection of deep cervical flexor muscle activity. Further investigation of this technique is warranted to ensure EMG activity from neighbouring muscles is not markedly influencing the signals recorded. This study compared deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscle activity with the activity of surrounding neck and jaw muscles during various anatomical movements of the neck and jaw in 10 volunteer subjects. DCF EMG activity was recorded with custom electrodes inserted via the nose and fixed by suction to the posterior mucosa of the oropharynx. Surface electrodes were placed over the sternocleidomastoid, anterior scalene, masseter and suprahyoid muscles. Positioned in supine, subjects performed isometric cranio-cervical flexion, cervical flexion, right and left cervical rotation, jaw clench and resisted jaw opening. Across all movements examined, EMG amplitude of the DCF muscles was greatest during neck movements that would require activity of the DCF muscles, particularly during cranio-cervical flexion, their primary anatomical action. The actions of jaw clench and resisted jaw opening demonstrated significantly less DCF EMG activity than the cranio-cervical flexion action ( p < 0.05). Across all other movements, the neighbouring neck and jaw muscles demonstrated greatest EMG amplitude during their respective primary anatomical actions, which occurred in the absence of increased EMG amplitude recorded from the DCF muscles. The finding of substantial EMG activity of the DCF muscles only during neck actions that would require their activity, particularly cranio-cervical flexion, and not during actions involving the jaw, provide further assurance that the majority of myoelectric signals detected from the nasopharyngeal electrode are from the DCF muscles.