The dynamic contributions of the otolith organs to human ocular torsion

• Published in: Experimental brain research Vol. 110; no. 2; p. 315
• Main Authors: Merfeld, D M, Teiwes, W, Clarke, A H, Scherer, H, Young, L R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 01.07.1996
• Subjects: Acceleration; Adult; Eye Movements - physiology; Female; Gravity Sensing - physiology; Humans; Male; Otolithic Membrane - physiology; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology; Rotation; Saccule and Utricle - physiology; NASA Discipline Neuroscience; NASA Discipline Number 16-10; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures; Non-NASA Center
• ISSN: 0014-4819
• DOI: 10.1007/bf00228562

We measured human ocular torsion (OT) monocularly (using video) and binocularly (using search coils) while sinusoidally accelerating (0.7 g) five human subjects along an earth-horizontal axis at five frequencies (0.35, 0.4, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 Hz). The compensatory nature of OT was investigated by changing the relative orientation of the dynamic (linear acceleration) and static (gravitational) cues. Four subject orientations were investigated: (1) Y-upright-acceleration along the interaural (y) axis while upright; (2) Y-supine-acceleration along the y-axis while supine; (3) Z-RED-acceleration along the dorsoventral (z) axis with right ear down; (4) Z-supine-acceleration along the z-axis while supine. Linear acceleration in the Y-upright, Y-supine and Z-RED orientations elicited conjugate OT. The smaller response in the Z-supine orientation appeared disconjugate. The amplitude of the response decreased and the phase lag increased with increasing frequency for each orientation. This frequency dependence does not match the frequency response of the regular or irregular afferent otolith neurons; therefore the response dynamics cannot be explained by simple peripheral mechanisms. The Y-upright responses were larger than the Y-supine responses (P < 0.05). This difference indicates that OT must be more complicated than a simple low-pass filtered response to interaural shear force, since the dynamic shear force along the interaural axis was identical in these two orientations. The Y-supine responses were, in turn, larger than the Z-RED responses (P < 0.01). Interestingly, the vector sum of the Y-supine responses plus Z-RED responses was not significantly different (P = 0.99) from the Y-upright responses. This suggests that, in this frequency range, the conjugate OT response during Y-upright stimulation might be composed of two components: (1) a response to shear force along the y-axis (as in Y-supine stimulation), and (2) a response to roll tilt of gravitoinertial force (as in Z-RED stimulation).