Comparison of near- and midterm outcomes of two unilateral percutaneous translaminar vertebral kyphoplasty procedures for the treatment of single-segment OVCF: a single-center randomized controlled study

• Published in: European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology Vol. 35; no. 1; p. 142
• Main Authors: Fuguo, Yang, Kang, Chen, Yuanchao, Luo, Renjian, He
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Springer Paris 01.04.2025; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Cements - therapeutic use; Female; Fractures; Fractures, Compression - surgery; Humans; Kyphoplasty - adverse effects; Kyphoplasty - methods; Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery; Pain Measurement; Polymethyl methacrylate; Prospective Studies; Spinal Fractures - surgery; Surgical Orthopedics; Traumatic Surgery; Treatment Outcome; Unilateral puncture percutaneous kyphoplasty; Cement distribution; Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; Percutaneous curved kyphoplasty; Prospective comparison
• ISSN: 1432-1068; 1633-8065; 1432-1068
• DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04241-4

Background Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) have become a significant public health concern due to the high morbidity and limited efficacy of conservative treatment. Conventional unilateral percutaneous vertebral kyphoplasty (UPKP) is beset by technical limitations, including the uneven distribution of cement and the inherent risk of leakage. Conversely, percutaneous curved kyphoplasty (PCKP) involves the creation of an accessible contralateral bone tunnel through a curved bone auger, a technique that, in theory, optimizes cement distribution. However, the clinical benefits of PCKP remain a subject of debate. Objective To prospectively compare the difference in near- and midterm efficacy between PCKP and UPKP for the treatment of single-segment OVCFs, and to clarify the clinical value of PCKP. Methodology A total of 89 patients with single-segment OVCFs were selected from October 2021 to March 2024 and divided into two groups: the PCKP group ( n  = 43) and the UPKP group ( n  = 46). At the 12-month follow-up, pain visual analog scores (VAS, Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI)) and cement distribution were assessed preoperatively, at 2 days, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The duration of surgery was recorded, as were the number of fluoroscopy, bone cement dose, and complications. Compare the two sets of parameters. Results (1) Functional improvement: the VAS score and ODI of patients in PCKP group was better than that of UPKP group at 2 days postoperatively ( P  < 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the VAS score and ODI of the two groups at the rest of the follow-up points ( P  > 0.05). (2) Bone cement: the amount of cement used in the PCKP group was significantly more than that in the UPKP group ( P  < 0.05), and the rate of excellent distribution and leakage rate were better ( P  < 0.05). (3) Vertebral recovery: the degree of recovery of the height of the anterior margin of the vertebral body was similar between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). (4) Complications: there was no difference in the rate of re-fracture ( P  > 0.05), and the risk of leakage was lower in the PCKP. Conclusion Both PCKP and UPKP can effectively treat single-segment OVCFs, but PCKP achieves better control of spatial distribution of cement through curved bone drilling technique and significantly reduces the risk of leakage, especially for patients with moderate and severe fractures, and PCKP has more advantages in early pain relief, but near- and intermediate-term follow-up shows that the efficacy of the two converge.