Artefacts of Change: The Disruptive Nature of Humanoid Robots Beyond Classificatory Concerns

• Published in: Science and engineering ethics Vol. 31; no. 2; p. 9
• Main Author: Friedman, Cindy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 28.03.2025; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Education; Engineering; Ethics; Human relations; Humanoid; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Medicine/Public Health; Morals; Original Research/Scholarship; Philosophy; Philosophy of Science; Robotics - ethics; Robots; Social Change; Technology - ethics; Uncertainty; Disruptive technology; Social robot; Human-robot interaction; Humanoid robot
• ISSN: 1471-5546; 1353-3452; 1471-5546
• DOI: 10.1007/s11948-025-00532-5

One characteristic of socially disruptive technologies is that they have the potential to cause uncertainty about the application conditions of a concept i.e., they are conceptually disruptive. Humanoid robots have done just this, as evidenced by discussions about whether, and under what conditions, humanoid robots could be classified as, for example, moral agents, moral patients, or legal and/or moral persons. This paper frames the disruptive effect of humanoid robots differently by taking the discussion beyond that of classificatory concerns. It does so by showing that humanoid robots are socially disruptive because they also transform how we experience and understand the world. Through inviting us to relate to a technological artefact as if it is human, humanoid robots have a profound impact upon the way in which we relate to different elements of our world. Specifically, I focus on three types of human relational experiences, and how the norms that surround them may be transformed by humanoid robots: (1) human-technology relations; (2) human-human relations; and (3) human-self relations. Anticipating the ways in which humanoid robots may change society is important given that once a technology is entrenched, it is difficult to counteract negative impacts. Therefore, we should try to anticipate them while we can still do something to prevent them. Since humanoid robots are currently relatively rudimentary, yet there is incentive to invest more in their development, it is now a good time to think carefully about how this technology may impact us.