Gravitational search algorithm: a comprehensive analysis of recent variants

Gravitational search algorithm is a nature-inspired algorithm based on the mathematical modelling of the Newton’s law of gravity and motion. In a decade, researchers have presented many variants of gravitational search algorithm by modifying its parameters to efficiently solve complex optimization p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMultimedia tools and applications Vol. 80; no. 5; pp. 7581 - 7608
Main Authors Mittal, Himanshu, Tripathi, Ashish, Pandey, Avinash Chandra, Pal, Raju
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.02.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Gravitational search algorithm is a nature-inspired algorithm based on the mathematical modelling of the Newton’s law of gravity and motion. In a decade, researchers have presented many variants of gravitational search algorithm by modifying its parameters to efficiently solve complex optimization problems. This paper conducts a comparative analysis among ten variants of gravitational search algorithm which modify three parameters, namely K b e s t , velocity, and position. Experiments are conducted on two sets of benchmark categories, namely standard functions and CEC2015 functions, including problems belonging to different categories such as unimodal, multimodal, and unconstrained optimization functions. The performance comparison is evaluated and statistically validated in terms of mean fitness value and convergence graph. In experiments, IGSA has achieved better precision with balanced trade-off between exploration and exploitation. Moreover, triple negative breast cancer dataset has been considered to analysis the performance of GSA variants for the nuclei segmentation. The variants performance has been analysed in terms of both qualitative and quantitive with aggregated Jaccard index as performance measure. Experiments affirm that IGSA-based method has outperformed other methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1380-7501
1573-7721
DOI:10.1007/s11042-020-09831-4