Patients With BRAF -Mutant NSCLC May Not Benefit From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Population-Based Study

There is no consensus on whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) would offer comparable benefit in mutant- NSCLC. We, therefore, conducted a study to ascertain the role of ICIs in mutant- NSCLC. Records of 4178 patients and 4462 samples from 15 studies were collected using the database from www....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJTO clinical and research reports Vol. 1; no. 1; p. 100006
Main Authors Zhang, Chenxing, Zhang, Chenyue, Lin, Jiamao, Li, Zhenxiang, Wang, Haiyong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier 01.03.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is no consensus on whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) would offer comparable benefit in mutant- NSCLC. We, therefore, conducted a study to ascertain the role of ICIs in mutant- NSCLC. Records of 4178 patients and 4462 samples from 15 studies were collected using the database from www.cbioportal.org. The role of mutation on the overall survival (OS) was analyzed in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate OS and the log rank test was used to compare the survival. Of the patients, 6.1% had the mutation. Mutations and copy numbers differed by sex. The programmed death ligand 1 expression was higher in patients with the wild-type compared with those with the mutation. mutation is linked with higher tumor mutational burden (  = 0.009). OS for patients with the ICI-treated mutant- and wild-type- NSCLC was 10 months and 11 months, respectively (  = 0.334). Subgroup analyses revealed that the median survival was 14 months in the non-V600E group and 5 months in the V600E group (  = 0.017). Our results revealed that mutant- NSCLC was associated with high tumor mutational burden. However, for patients with NSCLC receiving ICIs, OS was prolonged in those who had no V600E mutation compared with those who had V600E mutation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2666-3643
2666-3643
DOI:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100006