Evaluation of boar and bull sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction using flow cytometry

• Published in: Animal reproduction science Vol. 246; p. 106846
• Main Authors: Purdy, Phillip H., Graham, James K., Azevedo, Hymerson C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.11.2022
• Subjects: Acrosome; Acrosome Reaction; Animals; Capacitation; Cattle; Cryopreservation; Cryopreservation - methods; Cryopreservation - veterinary; Flow cytometry; Flow Cytometry - veterinary; Male; Semen; Semen Preservation - methods; Semen Preservation - veterinary; Sperm Capacitation - physiology; Spermatozoa; Spermatozoa - physiology; Swine; Capacitation; Flow cytometry; Acrosome reaction; Spermatozoa; Cryopreservation
• ISSN: 0378-4320; 1873-2232
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106846

Flow cytometry can be used to evaluate many sperm attributes and Dr. Duane Garner was influential in developing assays to understand sperm physiology and function. We review some of Dr. Garner’s work and describe experiments that evaluate sperm capacitation using Dr. Garner’s philosophy. In exploratory experiments, boar sperm were cryopreserved in lactose egg yolk (LEY) or Beltsville Freezing Extender 5 (BF5) and incubated in one capacitating medium. In another experiment, frozen-thawed bull sperm were incubated in TALP-Ca or CFDM1 capacitating media. In both experiments, sperm viability and capacitation were evaluated using multiple probes. Boar sperm frozen in LEY had greater survival rates (38%) than sperm frozen in BF5 (22%; P < 0.05) but did not capacitate as effectively as sperm in BF5 (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, bull sperm survived to a greater extent when incubated in TALP-Ca than in CFDM1 (P < 0.05) and had greater capacitation for most parameters (P < 0.05). Of particular interest, 77% of sperm incubated in TALP-Ca had activated second messenger systems involved in capacitation, compared with < 5% of sperm incubated in CFDM1. The results indicate different freezing and capacitating media induce different responses to sperm capacitation and functions. If only sperm viability and acrosomal integrity were evaluated, these results would be interpreted very differently. Dr. Garner’s philosophy of evaluating multiple sperm parameters was an impetus to determine unique treatment differences which help in understanding sperm capacitation, and design further experiments to determine how media content causes sperm physiology differences. •Boar cryopreservation medium will affect the ability of sperm to capacitate.•Capacitation medium modulates the response of bull sperm to capacitate in vitro.•The characteristics of sperm capacitation can be evaluated flow cytometrically.