JWST Noise Floor. I. Random Error Sources in JWST NIRCam Time Series
James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) transmission and emission spectra will provide invaluable glimpses of transiting exoplanet atmospheres, including possible biosignatures. This promising science from JWST, however, will require exquisite precision and understanding of systematic errors that can impa...
Saved in:
Published in | The Astronomical journal Vol. 160; no. 5; pp. 231 - 249 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Goddard Space Flight Center
The American Astronomical Society
01.11.2020
IOP Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) transmission and emission spectra will provide invaluable glimpses of transiting exoplanet atmospheres, including possible biosignatures. This promising science from JWST, however, will require exquisite precision and understanding of systematic errors that can impact the time series of planets crossing in front of and behind their host stars. Here, we provide estimates of the random noise sources affecting JWST Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) time-series data on the integration-to-integration level. We find that 1/ f noise can limit the precision of grism time series for two groups (230–1000 ppm depending on the extraction method and extraction parameters) but will average down like the square root of N frames/reads. The current NIRCam grism time-series mode is especially affected by 1/ f noise because its GRISMR dispersion direction is parallel to the detector fast-read direction, but could be alleviated in the GRISMC direction. Care should be taken to include as many frames as possible per visit to reduce this 1/ f noise source: thus, we recommend the smallest detector subarray sizes one can tolerate, four output channels, and readout modes that minimize the number of skipped frames (RAPID or BRIGHT2). We also describe a covariance-weighting scheme that can significantly lower the contributions from 1/ f noise as compared to sum extraction. We evaluate the noise introduced by preamplifier offsets, random telegraph noise, and high dark current resistor capacitor (RC) pixels and find that these are correctable below 10 ppm once background subtraction and pixel masking are performed. We explore systematic error sources in a companion paper. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | AAS25983 Laboratory Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Software, and Data GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center |
ISSN: | 0004-6256 1538-3881 1538-3881 |
DOI: | 10.3847/1538-3881/abb811 |